Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

In Re Cooper

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 29, 1892

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 4 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Luther Vs. Borden US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1849
  2. Georgia Vs. Stanton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1867
  3. Mccormick Vs. Sullivant US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  4. Hudson Vs. Guestier US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1808
  5. And although we were of opinion when the application for the rule was made, and subsequently held, McAllister v. United
    Search
  6. the writ is discretionary or demandable of right has been much debated. As remarked by MR. JUSTICE GRAY in Smith v. Whitney
    Search
  7. and Little v. Barreme
    Search
  8. Cranch 170, 6 U. S. 177 , and United States v. Rauscher
    Search
  9. U. S. 407 , 119 U. S. 418 , are cited. In Little v. Barreme
    Search
  10. In United States v. Rauscher
    Search
  11. review the action of the political departments upon the question, contrary to the settled law in that regard. Foster v. Neilson
    Search
  12. Williams v. Suffolk
    Search
  13. Jones v. United
    Search
  14. Nabob of Carnatic v. East
    Search
  15. Barclay v. Russell
    Search
  16. Penn v. Baltimore
    Search
  17. or omit to do, the court above ought not ordinarily to undertake to compel it to do or to omit. In United States v. Peters
    Search
  18. one for a writ of prohibition, as the want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the proceedings. United States v. Peters
    Search
  19. served with process or voluntarily appeared and made defense, the decree is not open to attack collaterally. Miller v. United
    Search
  20. Des Moines Nav. Company v. Iowa
    Search
  21. three miles from the shore, the legal inference is that the offense and seizure were within that limit. Hudson v. Guestier
    Search
  22. In Durousseau v. United
    Search
  23. McAllister v. United
    Search
  24. Smith v. Whitney
    Search
  25. and United States v. Rauscher
    Search
  26. In Little v. Barreme
    Search
  27. Foster v. Neilson
    Search
  28. In United States v. Peters
    Search
  29. Miller v. United
    Search
  30. United States v. Peters
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial