Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Budd

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 28, 1892

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 4 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. Castle Vs. Bullard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
    Relied / Followed
  2. Lincoln Vs. Claflin US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
    Relied / Followed
  3. Butler Vs. Watkins US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
  4. New York Mut. Life Ins. Co. Vs. Armstrong US Supreme Court · Apr 05, 1886
  5. U.S. 154 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Budd
    Search
  6. U.S. 154 (1892) United States v. Budd
    Search
  7. Railroad v. Attorney
    Search
  8. Colorado Coal Co. v. United
    Search
  9. United States v. Des
    Search
  10. the second section of the act, forfeited, and there is not even the possibility suggested in the case of United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  11. his examination from a direct to a cross-examination, and the opposing party is always adverse in interest. In Clarke v. Saffery
    Search
  12. People v. Mather
    Search
  13. Bank of Northern Liberties v. Davis
    Search
  14. Townes v. Alford
    Search
  15. rule is frequently invoked in cases of alleged frauds upon the government. It was applied by this Court in Castle v. Bullard
    Search
  16. in Lincoln v. Claflin
    Search
  17. Wall. 132, to an Page 144 U. S. 170 action for fraudulently obtaining property, and in Butler v. Watkins
    Search
  18. to prevent a patentee from using his invention. The authorities are fully reviewed in New York Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Armstrong
    Search
  19. Blatch v. Archer
    Search
  20. of or to contradict adverse testimony is a proper subject for consideration both at law and in equity. McDonough v. O'Neil
    Search
  21. Mass. 92. The rule was thus stated by Chief Justice Shaw in the celebrated case of Commonwealth v. Webster
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Budd
    Search
  23. of United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  24. In Clarke v. Saffery
    Search
  25. People v. Mather
    Search
  26. McDonough v. O'Neil
    Search
  27. of Commonwealth v. Webster
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial