Citation network
Camden Vs. Stuart
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 31, 1892
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 104 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court Camden v. StuartSearch
-
U.S. 104 (1892) Camden v. StuartSearch
-
nor by any device short of an actual payment in good faith, and it was not intended, by anything said in Clark v. BeverSearch
-
or Handley v. StutzSearch
-
or accounted for in such a manner as to operate as a satisfaction of the claim. In view of our decisions in Sawyer v. HoagSearch
-
Wall. 610, Scoville v. ThayerSearch
-
it is unavailing as against the claims of the creditors. Nothing that was said in the recent cases of Clark v. BeverSearch
-
U. S. 96 , Fogg v. BlairSearch
-
U. S. 118 , or Handley v. StutzSearch
-
the Court would be justified in accepting it as the correct valuation of the property turned over to the company. Coit v. GoldSearch
-
This was the rule laid down Page 144 U. S. 119 by this Court in Tilghman v. ProctorSearch
-
U. S. 136 , and approved in Callaghan v. MyersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 617 , 128 U. S. 666 , and in Kimberly v. ArmsSearch
-
U. S. 512 . See also Dean v. EmersonSearch
-
McDonough v. O'NeilSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Camden v. StuartSearch
-
Clark v. BeverSearch
-
Scoville v. ThayerSearch
-
of Clark v. BeverSearch
-
Coit v. GoldSearch
-
Dean v. EmersonSearch
-
Fogg v. BlairSearch
-
Handley v. StutzSearch
-
Tilghman v. ProctorSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial