Citation network
Glenn Vs. Marbury
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 16, 1892
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 499 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court Glenn v. MarburySearch
-
U.S. 499 (1892) Glenn v. MarburySearch
-
the amounts due from the subscribers of its stock. The proceedings in that cause are fully set out in Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
which judgment was entered. Upon appeal to the general term, the judgment was affirmed upon the authority of Glenn v. BuseySearch
-
Glenn could not maintain an action in the court below in his own name as trustee. Since the decision in Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
U. S. 319 , and Glenn v. LiggettSearch
-
be made by the trustees named in the deed of September 20, 1866, or by the receiver in the Reynolds suit. Glenn v. MaconSearch
-
F. 7. In Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
Scoville v. ThayerSearch
-
of that suit. For these reasons, the defense based upon limitation cannot be sustained. And in conformity with Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
and Glenn v. LiggettSearch
-
defendant only from the order in the Virginia court making the call or assessment on subscribers of stock. Glenn v. WilliamsSearch
-
him by the Virginia court to bring the present action in his own name as trustee, is a more serious one. In Tiernan v. JacksonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Pritchard v. NortonSearch
-
And in New York Guaranty Co. v. MemphisSearch
-
merely because his interest is an equitable one, bring a suit in equity for the recovery of the demand. Hayward v. AndrewsSearch
-
Adair v. WinchasterSearch
-
Moseley v. BoushSearch
-
Doggett v. HartSearch
-
Smiley v. BellSearch
-
Mart. and Y.Tenn. 378, and the English and American notes to Ryall v. RowlesSearch
-
to assent to every lawful disposition made of its property by the corporation. When this point was made in Glenn v. BuseySearch
-
could itself make it, if the interest of creditors required that to be done. In other words, as said in Scoville v. ThayerSearch
-
U. S. 143 , 105 U. S. 145 , and repeated in Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
See Page 145 U. S. 511 also Glenn v. WilliamsSearch
-
made. There is no reason why the trustee Glenn could not have sued in the name of the company, for, as said in Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
concurring with the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia in Hamilton v. GlennSearch
-
We concur entirely in the views expressed by Mr. Justice Cox, speaking for the court in Glenn v. BuseySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Glenn v. MarburySearch
-
of Glenn v. BuseySearch
-
Glenn v. MaconSearch
-
In Hawkins v. GlennSearch
-
Scoville v. ThayerSearch
-
Glenn v. WilliamsSearch
-
In Tiernan v. JacksonSearch
-
New York Guaranty Co. v. MemphisSearch
-
Ryall v. RowlesSearch
-
Glenn v. BuseySearch
-
Hamilton v. GlennSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial