Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Clark Vs. Bever

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 02, 1891

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

74 entries 14 linked 60 unlinked
Show
  1. Boom Company Vs. Patterson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  2. Ellis Vs. Davis US Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1883
  3. Upshur County Vs. Rich US Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1890
  4. Sanger Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  5. Webster Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  6. Pullman Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  7. Chubb Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  8. Hawkins Vs. Glenn US Supreme Court · May 13, 1889
  9. Hess Vs. Reynolds US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1885
  10. Payne Vs. Hook US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  11. Upton Vs. Tribilcock US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  12. Sawyer Vs. Hoag US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  13. Peters Vs. Bain US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1890
  14. New Albany Vs. Burke US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1870
  15. U.S. 96 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. Bever
    Search
  16. U.S. 96 (1891) Clark v. Bever
    Search
  17. creditors of the railway company, and, pursuant to its direction, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Clark v. Bever
    Search
  18. except a circuit court has jurisdiction to allow or disallow a claim against the estate of a deceased person. Tillman v. Bowman
    Search
  19. Shropshire v. Long
    Search
  20. claim as one to be paid by the executor for administrator so far as the estate in his hands is sufficient. Foteaux v. Lepage
    Search
  21. Voorhies v. Eubank
    Search
  22. Little v. Sinnett
    Search
  23. Smith v. Shawhan
    Search
  24. Dessaint v. Foster
    Search
  25. that no such result can be constitutionally effected by state legislation. The case of Page 139 U. S. 103 Hess v. Reynolds
    Search
  26. See also Payne v. Hook
    Search
  27. Delaware County v. Diebold
    Search
  28. amount, and a writ of error had been prosecuted by him to reverse that judgment. The case is different from Miller v. Clark
    Search
  29. The plaintiff contends that our decisions are to that effect. Let us see. In Sawyer v. Hoag
    Search
  30. is a trust fund sub modo for the benefit of its general creditors. And this principle was reaffirmed in Upton v. Tribilcock
    Search
  31. Morgan Co. v. Allen
    Search
  32. Scoville v. Thayer
    Search
  33. U. S. 319 , 131 U. S. 335 , and Richardson v. Green
    Search
  34. inquiry by ascertaining the character of the particular cases in which it has been applied by this Court. In Sawyer v. Hoag
    Search
  35. to be unpaid to the extent of the amount received back from the corporation under the pretense of a loan. In Upton v. Tribilcock
    Search
  36. the subscription and accepting, as in full payment, his note for the twenty percent agreed to be paid. Sanger v. Upton
    Search
  37. case of the actual subscription of stock upon which the subscriber was held to pay the full sum subscribed. In Webster v. Upton
    Search
  38. promise upon his part to pay. In Chubb v. Upton
    Search
  39. liable to pay the amount thereof when called upon by the corporation or its assignee in bankruptcy, and in Pullman v. Upton
    Search
  40. the transferor, was liable for the balance due on such stock. The doctrine of the latter case was approved in Hawkins v. Glenn
    Search
  41. In Morgan Co. v. Allen
    Search
  42. it withdraw its bonds from that fund, and thereby avoid liability to the general creditors of the company. In Scoville v. Thayer
    Search
  43. which they could have set aside whenever their rights intervened and their claims were unsatisfied. In Richardson v. Green
    Search
  44. this upon the ground stated in Webster v. Upton
    Search
  45. modifying in any respect the principles laid down in the cases above cited, nor the salutary rule laid down in Sawyer v. Hoag
    Search
  46. These principles were reaffirmed in Richardson v. Green
    Search
  47. that did not give creditors and other stockholders just ground for complaint. As said by this Court in Peters v. Bain
    Search
  48. Graham v. Railroad
    Search
  49. Railway v. Ham
    Search
  50. U. S. 541 . The general grounds upon which we have proceeded are supported by New Albany v. Burke
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial