Citation network
Heath Vs. Wallace
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 573 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Heath v. WallaceSearch
-
U.S. 573 (1891) Heath v. WallaceSearch
-
certification thereof by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, after one year from the date of the act. Wright v. RoseberrySearch
-
ante, 138 U. S. 134 . As held in Tubbs v. WilhoitSearch
-
therefore be taken according to the acceptation of those most familiar with its use and significance. In Wallace v. StateSearch
-
In California v. UnitedSearch
-
survey of this township and the return of the deputy have been passed upon by this department in the case of Wallace v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In addition to the adjudication of this department Page 138 U. S. 582 in the case of Wallace v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In California v. FlemingSearch
-
the most respectful consideration, and ought not to be overruled without cogent reasons, for, as said in United States v. MooreSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. WhitneySearch
-
Schell v. FancheSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
form a part of the survey, and are to be considered along with the plat of the townships to which they relate. Cragin v. PowellSearch
-
field notes of the boundary lines and the annotations made upon the plat. The Secretary of the Interior, in California v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
are, in the absence of fraud or imposition, conclusive and binding on the courts of the country. Johnson v. TowsleySearch
-
Steel v. SmeltingSearch
-
surveys referred to in the second clause of the fourth section of the Act of July 23, 1866. As said in Tubbs v. WilhoitSearch
-
Wright v. RoseberrySearch
-
has invariably held such maps or plats not to be the segregation maps referred to in the Act of July 23, 1866. Sutton v. FassetSearch
-
People v. CowellSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Heath v. WallaceSearch
-
Wright v. RoseberrySearch
-
In Wallace v. StateSearch
-
of Wallace v. CaliforniaSearch
-
United States v. MooreSearch
-
California v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. TowsleySearch
-
Sutton v. FassetSearch
-
Smelting Company v. KempSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial