Citation network
Barney Vs. Oelrichs
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 529 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Barney v. OelrichsSearch
-
U.S. 529 (1891) Barney v. OelrichsSearch
-
of temporary objects, and such we understand to be the result of decision by the courts of New York. In Penfield v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
Frost v. BrisbinSearch
-
Haggart v. MorganSearch
-
N.Y. 422, and Weitkamp v. LoehrSearch
-
actual residence of the defendant, and not his domicile, that determined the rights of the parties, while Burroughs v. BloomerSearch
-
Ford v. BabcockSearch
-
Cole v. JessupSearch
-
Satterthwaite v. AbercrombieSearch
-
Blatchford 308, 24 F. 543, and Engel v. FischerSearch
-
Mr. Justice Nelson, then Chief Justice of New York, delivering the opinion of the court in Frost v. BrisbinSearch
-
has been often cited with approval by the courts of New York, as well as of many other states. In Bartlett v. TheSearch
-
plaintiff's home was in Westchester County, his residence for a portion of the year was in the City of New York. Frost v. BrisbinSearch
-
So in Douglas v. MayorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and liable to be taxed as such although his domicile was in Flushing. These cases were favorably commented on in Bell v. PierceSearch
-
and notorious, so that a creditor might with reasonable diligence find his debtor, and serve him with process. Engel v. FischerSearch
-
But to bring a case within the second exception, something more than absence was essential to be shown. In Wheeler v. WebsterSearch
-
In Harden v. PalmerSearch
-
and therefore the periods of absence were properly excluded. In Burroughs v. BloomerSearch
-
of a resident of the state continuing to reside therein were not to be deducted in computing the statutory term. Ford v. BabcockSearch
-
Vermont, and New Hampshire will be found in the well considered opinion of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Pells v. SnellSearch
-
Wend. 11, and Boardman v. HouseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Barney v. OelrichsSearch
-
of New York. In Penfield v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
and Weitkamp v. LoehrSearch
-
Burroughs v. BloomerSearch
-
and Engel v. FischerSearch
-
In Bartlett v. TheSearch
-
the City of New York. Frost v. BrisbinSearch
-
Douglas v. MayorSearch
-
Bell v. PierceSearch
-
Engel v. FischerSearch
-
In Wheeler v. WebsterSearch
-
In Burroughs v. BloomerSearch
-
Pells v. SnellSearch
-
and Boardman v. HouseSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial