Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Johnson Vs. Powers

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 09, 1891

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 5 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Kennedy Vs. Creswell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  2. Stacy Vs. Thrasher US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1848
  3. Mclean Vs. Meek US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  4. Payne Vs. Hook US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  5. Aspden Vs. Nixon US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1846
  6. U.S. 156 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. Powers
    Search
  7. U.S. 156 (1891) Johnson v. Powers
    Search
  8. to administer, as between citizens of different states, any deceased person's assets within its jurisdiction. Payne v. Hook
    Search
  9. cannot authorize him to maintain any suit in the courts, either state or national, held in any other state. Stacy v. Thrasher
    Search
  10. Clark v. Davis
    Search
  11. Lothrop v. Conely
    Search
  12. properly be only an allowance or disallowance of the claim, and not in the form of a judgment at common law. La Roe v. Freeland
    Search
  13. court, it has the effect of a judgment, and cannot be collaterally impeached by either of those parties. Shurbun v. Hooper
    Search
  14. of the estate, and of other persons interested therein, can be of any binding effect, even in Michigan. See Lothrop v. Conely
    Search
  15. the same or a different person, appointed there, or against any other person having assets of the deceased. Aspden v. Nixon
    Search
  16. Low v. Bartlett
    Search
  17. Allen 259. In Stacy v. Thrasher
    Search
  18. How. 45 U. S. 60 -61. In Low v. Bartlett
    Search
  19. death. Did the plaintiff sue in his capacity as administrator, it is freely conceded that under the case of Noonan v. Bradley
    Search
  20. to these sections by the Supreme Court of Michigan, the commissioners are an independent special tribunal, Lothrop v. Conely
    Search
  21. Mich. 757, and while not a court in the constitutional sense, they act judicially in the allowance of claims. Fish v. Morse
    Search
  22. Shurbun v. Hooper
    Search
  23. the administrator of the same estate in the State of New York, it is conceded at once that under the case of Stacy v. Thrasher
    Search
  24. be brought or a judgment obtained. I see no reason why this case is not controlled in this particular by that of Case v. Beauregard
    Search
  25. execution is not a necessary prerequisite to equitable interference. Such was also the ruling of this Court in Sage v. Memphis
    Search
  26. Little Rock Railroad, 125 U. S. 361 , 125 U. S. 376 . Indeed, it appears from the case of Kennedy v. Creswell
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. Powers
    Search
  28. La Roe v. Freeland
    Search
  29. Michigan. See Lothrop v. Conely
    Search
  30. In Stacy v. Thrasher
    Search
  31. In Low v. Bartlett
    Search
  32. of Noonan v. Bradley
    Search
  33. Fish v. Morse
    Search
  34. of Stacy v. Thrasher
    Search
  35. of Case v. Beauregard
    Search
  36. Sage v. Memphis
    Search
  37. of Kennedy v. Creswell
    Search
  38. Noonan v. Bradley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial