Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Brown Chemical Co. Vs. Meyer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 08, 1891

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 3 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Manufacturing Company Vs. Trainer US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  2. Canal Company Vs. Clark US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
  3. Mclean Vs. Fleming US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  4. U.S. 540 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer
    Search
  5. U.S. 540 (1891) Brown Chemical Company v. Meyer
    Search
  6. article, or of the place where it is manufactured or produced, cannot be monopolized as a trademark, Canal Company v. Clark
    Search
  7. Caswell v. Davis
    Search
  8. Thomson v. Winchester
    Search
  9. Raggett v. Findlater
    Search
  10. where a fraud upon another is manifestly intended or where he has assigned or parted with his right to use it. McLean v. Fleming
    Search
  11. Goodyear Company v. Goodyear
    Search
  12. Hoxie v. Chaney
    Search
  13. The distinction between the lawful and the unlawful use of one's own name is illustrated in the case of Croft v. Day
    Search
  14. In Holloway v. Holloway
    Search
  15. The principle of this case was approved by this Court in the case of McLean v. Fleming
    Search
  16. their goods as those of the plaintiff. The law upon this subject is considered in the recent case of Lawrence Mfg. Co. v. Tennessee
    Search
  17. his name in connection with the preparation of the tonic as part of the goodwill of the business. In the case of Kidd v. Johnson
    Search
  18. So, in Mendendez v. Holt
    Search
  19. such goodwill. There are a few cases indicating that the mere right to use a name is not assignable, notably Chadwick v. Covell
    Search
  20. it may not be assigned to an outgoing partner or to a successor in business as an incident to its goodwill. Ainsworth v. Walmsley
    Search
  21. Derringer v. Plate
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer
    Search
  23. Brown Chemical Company v. Meyer
    Search
  24. of Croft v. Day
    Search
  25. of McLean v. Fleming
    Search
  26. of Lawrence Mfg. Co. v. Tennessee
    Search
  27. of Kidd v. Johnson
    Search
  28. Mendendez v. Holt
    Search
  29. Chadwick v. Covell
    Search
  30. Ainsworth v. Walmsley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial