Citation network
Ball Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 27, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Ball v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 140 U.S. 118 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Ball v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 140 U.S. 118 (1891) Ball v. UnitedSearch
-
he was judge de facto, if not de jure, and his acts as such are not open to collateral attack. Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
Clark v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Fowler v. BebeeSearch
-
Commonwealth v. TaberSearch
-
State v. CarrollSearch
-
Keith v. StateSearch
-
People v. BangsSearch
-
of record that the defendant was asked before sentence if he had anything to say why it should not be pronounced. Rex v. HarrisSearch
-
Messner v. PeopleSearch
-
Dougherty v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Croker v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
James v. StateSearch
-
State v. JenningsSearch
-
Chit.Cr.Law 699. In Hamilton v. CommonwealthSearch
-
he had anything to say why sentence of death should not be pronounced on him, the absence of which was ruled in Rex v. GearySearch
-
Salk. 630, and King v. SpekeSearch
-
before the court at the time of pronouncing the sentence are compendiously given by Mr. Justice Scholfield in Fielden v. PeopleSearch
-
might tend to deter others from the commission of similar offenses. The same learned court held, however, in Gannon v. PeopleSearch
-
Swann v. BroomeSearch
-
Baxter v. PeopleSearch
-
Chapman v. StateSearch
-
Commonwealth v. MacloonSearch
-
Chapman v. PeopleSearch
-
Riggs v. StateSearch
-
People v. WallaceSearch
-
In United States v. GuiteauSearch
-
the District, became applicable to such a murder. This subject received elaborate consideration in Commonwealth v. MacloonSearch
-
See also In re Palliser, 136 U. S. 257 , 136 U. S. 265 , and cases cited. In United States v. McGillSearch
-
must be given and the death happen there, Congress not then having provided for such a case. And see United States v. ArmstrongSearch
-
United States v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ball v. UnitedSearch
-
Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
Rex v. HarrisSearch
-
In Hamilton v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Rex v. GearySearch
-
and King v. SpekeSearch
-
Fielden v. PeopleSearch
-
Gannon v. PeopleSearch
-
In United States v. McGillSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial