Citation network
HardIn Vs. Jordan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 11, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 371 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Hardin v. JordanSearch
-
U.S. 371 (1891) Hardin v. JordanSearch
-
in 1841, and is still the law of that state notwithstanding the opinion of its highest court in Trustees of Schools v. SchrollSearch
-
Ill. 509. The ruling of the Supreme Court of Illinois in its opinion in Trustees of Schools v. SchrollSearch
-
waters whose margins are thus meandered, and that the waters themselves constitute the real boundary. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSearch
-
Jefferis v. EastSearch
-
Middleton v. PritchardSearch
-
Canal Trustees v. HavenSearch
-
Houck v. YatesSearch
-
Fuller v. DauphinSearch
-
Boorman v. SunnuchsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Boom Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
Clute v. FisherSearch
-
Ridgway v. LudlowSearch
-
Kraut v. CrawfordSearch
-
Forsyth v. SmaleSearch
-
of navigation and fisher -- and cannot be retained or granted out to individuals by the United States. Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
Weber v. CommissionersSearch
-
in making regulations of commerce, and in subjecting the lands to the necessities and uses of commerce. See Manchester v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Smith v. MarylandSearch
-
Den v. JerseySearch
-
and to what extent this prerogative of the state over the lands under water shall be exercised. In the case of Barney v. KeokukSearch
-
was taken in quite a recent case with regard to titles on the Sacramento river under the law of California. Packer v. BirdSearch
-
the flow of the tide, whether actually navigable or not, belong to the proprietors of the adjoining lands. Middleton v. PritchardSearch
-
Morgan v. ReadingSearch
-
covered thereby which are inseparable from sovereignty. As was well said by the Supreme Court of Illinois in Middleton v. PritchardSearch
-
If it were not for the decision of the Supreme Court of that state in the case of Trustees v. SchrollSearch
-
the law of Illinois in this regard is the common law, and nothing else, and that the opinion of the court in Trustees v. SchrollSearch
-
observed, and we believe that there was never any departure from this course of decision until the case of Trustees v. SchrollSearch
-
that the rule of the common law was the law of that state in regard to the rights of riparian owners. See Middleton v. PritchardSearch
-
Trustees v. HavenSearch
-
Beckman v. KreamerSearch
-
Chicago v. LaflinSearch
-
Chicago & Pac. Railroad Co. v. SteinSearch
-
Washington Ice Co. v. ShortallSearch
-
The last of the above cited cases was decided in May, 1888, and reaffirmed in all things the case of Middleton v. PritchardSearch
-
slough, and that the title extended to its center, and included the island in question. The case of Washington Ice Co. v. ShortallSearch
-
is founded on the civil law, by which lakes and ponds are regularly of private ownership. Lord Selborne, in Mackenzie v. BankesSearch
-
courts in recent times, and has been decided as from the reason of the thing we should anticipate it would be. Bristow v. CormicanSearch
-
Then, after taking notice of a hesitating remark on the subject made by Justice Wightman in Marshall v. UlleswaterSearch
-
Paine v. WoodsSearch
-
Commonwealth v. VincentSearch
-
In other states the rule of the common law has prevailed as enunciated in Bristow v. CormicanSearch
-
as in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, etc. See Ledyard v. TenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hardin v. JordanSearch
-
Trustees of Schools v. SchrollSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial