Citation network
United States Vs. Ewing
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 11, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 142 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. EwingSearch
-
U.S. 142 (1891) United States v. EwingSearch
-
is allowable. (7) That the items for fees for dockets, etc., which were allowed on the authority of United States v. WallaceSearch
-
had proper to be done, and inferentially for what services the commissioner is entitled to payment. United States v. RundlettSearch
-
United States v. HortonSearch
-
Dillon 94. We have held in United States v. JonesSearch
-
St. 505, c. 359, in a circuit or district court, for the recovery of the amount claimed. United States v. KnoxSearch
-
as against a writ of habeas corpus from a state court. Said Mr. Justice Story, speaking for this Court in Randolph v. DonaldsonSearch
-
be no abuse of such discretion, we do not feel at liberty to review Page 140 U. S. 146 his action. Stafford v. UnitedSearch
-
in a criminal case by the accused and his sureties is a single act, for which only one fee can be charged. Churchill v. UnitedSearch
-
and 22d items for fees for dockets, indexes, etc., appear to have been allowed upon the authority of United States v. WallaceSearch
-
and should not be considered as a general inhibition for all allowances of docket fees. The cases of United States v. DicksonSearch
-
Pet. 141, and Minis v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In the case of Minis v. UnitedSearch
-
A majority of the courts in which Page 140 U. S. 150 this question has arisen have adopted this view. Faris v. UnitedSearch
-
Strong v. UnitedSearch
-
McKinistry v. UnitedSearch
-
Thornley v. UnitedSearch
-
Calvert v. UnitedSearch
-
Crawford v. UnitedSearch
-
Goodrich v. UnitedSearch
-
with a due regard for the interests of the government and the protection of the accused, we held in United States v. JonesSearch
-
It is true that a number of items were rejected by the court below which, upon the authority of United States v. JonesSearch
-
by the plaintiff from the disallowance of such items, we do not feel at liberty to consider them. United States v. HickeySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. EwingSearch
-
of United States v. WallaceSearch
-
United States v. RundlettSearch
-
United States v. JonesSearch
-
Stafford v. UnitedSearch
-
Churchill v. UnitedSearch
-
of United States v. DicksonSearch
-
and Minis v. UnitedSearch
-
of Minis v. UnitedSearch
-
Faris v. UnitedSearch
-
of United States v. JonesSearch
-
United States v. KnoxSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial