Citation network
Crutcher Vs. Kentucky
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 25, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 47 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
U.S. 47 (1891) Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
S. 51 statement. The Supreme Court of Kentucky, in disposing of the case, gave the following opinion ( Crutcher v. CommonwealthSearch
-
It seems to us that the case of Woodward v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The court then referred to the cases of Smith v. AlabamaSearch
-
Railway v. AlabamaSearch
-
of state legislation, but within that of national legislation. Inman Steamship Co. Page 141 U. S. 58 v. TinkerSearch
-
commerce as it is with regard to foreign commerce. No difference is perceivable between the two. Telegraph Co. v. TexasSearch
-
Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Phila. Steamship Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Norfolk & Western Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
out a license for carrying on interstate commerce, no matter how specious the pretext may be for imposing it. Pickard v. PullmanSearch
-
Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
Norfolk & Western Railroad Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U. S. 114 . As a summation of the whole matter, it was aptly said by the present CHIEF JUSTICE in Lyng v. MichiganSearch
-
is confined to points and places wholly within the state. The cases to this effect are numerous. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSearch
-
Liverpool Insurance Company v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Cooper Manufacturing Company v. FergusonSearch
-
Phila. Fire Association v. NewSearch
-
to regulate the operations of foreign and interstate commerce. We have lately expressly decided in the case of Leisy v. HardinSearch
-
a modified way. Such things are properly subject to the police power of the state. Chief Justice Marshall, in Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
gambling, horse racing, or anything else that the legislature may deem opposed to the public welfare. Bartemeyer v. IowaSearch
-
Fertilizing Co. v. HydeSearch
-
Foster v. KansasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Crutcher v. CommonwealthSearch
-
of Woodward v. CommonwealthSearch
-
of Smith v. AlabamaSearch
-
Telegraph Co. v. TexasSearch
-
Pickard v. PullmanSearch
-
Lyng v. MichiganSearch
-
of Leisy v. HardinSearch
-
Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Bartemeyer v. IowaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial