Citation network
Fowler Vs. Equitable Trust Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 28, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Fowler v. EquitableSearch
-
Trust Co. - 141 U.S. 384 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Fowler v. EquitableSearch
-
Trust Co., 141 U.S. 384 (1891) Fowler v. EquitableSearch
-
that the court granted the application for a rehearing at the term at which the first decree was rendered. Stockton v. BishopSearch
-
court that the mere taking of interest in advance does not bring a loan within the prohibition of usury. In Goodrich v. ReynoldsSearch
-
McGill v. WareSearch
-
Mitchell v. LymanSearch
-
Brown v. Scottish-AmericanSearch
-
Hoyt v. PawtucketSearch
-
Telford v. GarrelsSearch
-
nothing more than lend his money at such rate of interest as the statute permits. Such is the rule in Illinois. Hoyt v. PawtucketSearch
-
Sanford v. KaneSearch
-
These questions are answered by the Supreme Court of Illinois. In Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
In the previous case of Peddicord v. ConnardSearch
-
Leonard v. PattonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ill. 99, 104. We do not find that the principles announced in Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
by the state court. On the contrary, that case has been frequently referred to, and its doctrines recognized. In Hoyt v. PawtucketSearch
-
charge the borrower commissions without thereby making a loan at the full rate of legal interest usurious. Ballinger v. BourlandSearch
-
Phillips v. RobertsSearch
-
Boylston v. BainSearch
-
Ill. 283. Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
In Cox v. LifeSearch
-
latter, exacts from the borrower a sum in excess of lawful interest, does not make the loan usurious, said of Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
Ballinger v. BourlandSearch
-
Kihlholz v. WolfSearch
-
Meers v. StevensSearch
-
Ammondson v. RyanSearch
-
Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. BoggsSearch
-
Ill. 119, 127. This case cannot be distinguished from Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
such relief only upon the condition that he shall pay, or offer to pay, the principal sum, with legal interest. Clark v. FinlonSearch
-
Sanner v. SmithSearch
-
Carter v. MosesSearch
-
Henderson v. BellewSearch
-
Ill. 322, 324, and Tooke v. NewmanSearch
-
settled there that one who has voluntarily paid usurious interest cannot recover it back in an action at law. Riddle v. RosenfeldSearch
-
Hadden v. InnesSearch
-
Town v. WoodSearch
-
Tompkins v. HillSearch
-
made by him on account of interest applied in diminution of such part of the principal as remains unpaid. Harris v. BresslerSearch
-
Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
Hamill v. MasonSearch
-
Heffner v. VandolahSearch
-
Saylor v. DanielsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Fowler v. EquitableSearch
-
In Goodrich v. ReynoldsSearch
-
Illinois. Hoyt v. PawtucketSearch
-
the Supreme Court of Illinois. In Payne v. NewcombSearch
-
of Peddicord v. ConnardSearch
-
In Hoyt v. PawtucketSearch
-
Ballinger v. BourlandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial