Citation network
Fire Ins. Ass'n, Ltd. Vs. Wickham
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 16, 1891
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 564 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Fire Ins. Ass'n, Ltd. v. WickhamSearch
-
U.S. 564 (1891) Fire Insurance Association Ltd. v. WickhamSearch
-
delivered the opinion of the Court. As we held in this case, on the motion to dismiss ( Fire Insurance Association v. WickhamSearch
-
in any way the general and familiar doctrine enforced by this Court in repeated decisions, from the case of Hunt v. RousmanierSearch
-
Wheat. 174, decided in 1823, to that of Seitz v. RefrigeratingSearch
-
compromise, but will be treated as without consideration and void. As was said by Chief Justice Waite in United States v. BostwickSearch
-
although it was subsequently held in Baird v. UnitedSearch
-
Fitch v. SuttonSearch
-
Harriman v. HarrimanSearch
-
Redfield v. HollandSearch
-
Ryan v. WardSearch
-
American Bridge Co. v. MurphySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
White v. JordanSearch
-
Bailey v. DaySearch
-
Weber v. CouchSearch
-
Foakes v. BeerSearch
-
that nothing can be treated as a consideration that is not intended as such by the parties. Thus, in Philpot v. GruningerSearch
-
it must have been offered by one party and accepted by the other as one element of the contract. In Kirkpatrick v. MuirheadSearch
-
Ellis v. ClarkSearch
-
that this right to delay payment was a stipulation which the insurer could waive at his option, Insurance Company v. NortonSearch
-
made to express more than intended, and that the creditor had in fact claims that were not included. Thus, in Simons v. JohnsonSearch
-
Other cases to the same effect are Lawrence v. SchuylkillSearch
-
Payler v. HomershamSearch
-
Jackson v. StackhouseSearch
-
Grumley v. WebbSearch
-
Price v. TreatSearch
-
Railroad v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Fire Ins. Ass'n, Ltd. v. WickhamSearch
-
Fire Insurance Association Ltd. v. WickhamSearch
-
Fire Insurance Association v. WickhamSearch
-
of Hunt v. RousmanierSearch
-
of Seitz v. RefrigeratingSearch
-
Baird v. UnitedSearch
-
In Kirkpatrick v. MuirheadSearch
-
Simons v. JohnsonSearch
-
Lawrence v. SchuylkillSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial