Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Comanche County Vs. Lewis

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 27, 1890

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 2 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Broughton Vs. Pensacola US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  2. Mount Pleasant Vs. Beckwith US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  3. U.S. 198 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Comanche County v. Lewis
    Search
  4. U.S. 198 (1890) Comanche County v. Lewis
    Search
  5. expense bonds. The circuit court held the latter void, the others valid, and judgment was rendered accordingly. Lewis v. Comanche
    Search
  6. given to the legislature, as was held by the supreme court of the state in the case of State ex Rel. Attorney General v. Commissioners
    Search
  7. by special act. The provision of article 12 of the constitution has no application to counties as counties. Beach v. Leahy
    Search
  8. the county offices, and the legislature may provide for a less number of county officers than the usual number. Borton v. Buck
    Search
  9. Leavenworth v. State
    Search
  10. ruled by the supreme court of the state. See the case in 12 Kan., supra. See also State ex Rel. Atty. Gen. v. Stevens
    Search
  11. Harper County), 21 Kan. 210, and State v. Yoxall
    Search
  12. be a de facto organization upon which this recognition may act, as was held in State ex Rel. Attorney General v. Ford
    Search
  13. time the organization be abandoned and there be no officers to be reached by the process of the courts. State ex Rel. v. Yoxall
    Search
  14. to validate the bonds in the hands of a bona fide holder. It shows, in the language of School District v. Stone
    Search
  15. as these bonds were issued after the act of 1872 went into effect, they fall within the decision in the case of Lewis v. Commissioners
    Search
  16. U. S. 739 , rather than within that in the case of Bissell v. Spring
    Search
  17. it reference may well be had to the opinion of the Supreme Court of Kansas in the case of Leavenworth County v. Miller
    Search
  18. Prior to the issue of these bonds, the supreme court of the state had held, in the case of Doty v. Ellsbree
    Search
  19. a recital that the bond is issued in pursuance of and in accordance with the act, is sufficient. The case of Scipio v. Wright
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Comanche County v. Lewis
    Search
  21. Lewis v. Comanche
    Search
  22. Rel. Attorney General v. Commissioners
    Search
  23. Beach v. Leahy
    Search
  24. Borton v. Buck
    Search
  25. Rel. Atty. Gen. v. Stevens
    Search
  26. and State v. Yoxall
    Search
  27. Rel. Attorney General v. Ford
    Search
  28. Rel. v. Yoxall
    Search
  29. of School District v. Stone
    Search
  30. of Lewis v. Commissioners
    Search
  31. of Bissell v. Spring
    Search
  32. of Leavenworth County v. Miller
    Search
  33. of Doty v. Ellsbree
    Search
  34. of Scipio v. Wright
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial