Citation network
Geilinger Vs. Philippi
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 03, 1890
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 246 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Geilinger v. PhilippiSearch
-
U.S. 246 (1890) Geilinger v. PhilippiSearch
-
Co., of New Orleans, and also of Green, Stewart & Co., of Liverpool, England, in the suits of Bank in Winterthur v. GilbertSearch
-
H. Green and Geilinger & Blum v. GilbertSearch
-
That on or about the 20th of May, 1887, under writs of alias fi. fa. issued in the case of Geilinger & Blum v. GilbertSearch
-
H. Green and in the case of the Bank in Winterthur v. GilbertSearch
-
the syndic as their trustee, and pass to the creditors by the cession, whether included in his schedule or not. Dwight v. SimonSearch
-
Muse v. YarboroughSearch
-
West v. HisSearch
-
Dwight v. SmithSearch
-
therefore cited to the proposition by Chief Justice Taney, delivering the opinion of this Court in Bank of Tennessee v. HornSearch
-
or execution, but is held to be administered and disposed of according to law, for the benefit of the creditors. Rivas v. HunstockSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Jacquet v. HisSearch
-
Walling Heirs v. MorefieldSearch
-
Nimick v. IngramSearch
-
property and the distribution of the proceeds in concurso among the creditors and is protected accordingly. Laforest v. HisSearch
-
Creditors, ubi supra. In Nimick v. IngramSearch
-
is quoted from and approved in Tua v. CarriereSearch
-
of the syndic to have the schedule amended so as to include it, and to take possession and administer upon it, Chaffe v. ScheenSearch
-
Green's assets were placed in gremio legis, and could not be seized by process from another court. Peale v. PhippsSearch
-
in the state court upon the termination of the administration there it is not necessary to consider. Williams v. BenedictSearch
-
Union Bank v. Jolly'sSearch
-
writs of fi. fa. were issued determines the invalidity of the seizure under them. Rio Grande Railroad Company v. GomilaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Geilinger v. PhilippiSearch
-
Winterthur v. GilbertSearch
-
of Geilinger & Blum v. GilbertSearch
-
Dwight v. SimonSearch
-
Rivas v. HunstockSearch
-
Laforest v. HisSearch
-
In Nimick v. IngramSearch
-
Chaffe v. ScheenSearch
-
Williams v. BenedictSearch
-
Rio Grande Railroad Company v. GomilaSearch
-
Peale v. PhippsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial