Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Ormsby Vs. Webb

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 03, 1890

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 2 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Carter's Heirs Vs. Cutting US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1814
  2. Metropolitan Railroad Co. Vs. Moore US Supreme Court · May 02, 1887
  3. U.S. 47 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Ormsby v. Webb
    Search
  4. U.S. 47 (1890) Ormsby v. Webb
    Search
  5. the order of the probate court and to pass upon the questions of law raised by such bills of exceptions. Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  6. Ness, 6 How. 62, and Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  7. the judgment be affirmed because the writ of error was sued out merely for delay. That motion was overruled. Ormsby v. Webb
    Search
  8. property of a greater value than that amount. And this view, it is argued, is sustained by the decisions in Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  9. Ness, 6 How. 62, 47 U. S. 67 , and Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  10. in those cases. Before examining those cases, our attention will be first given to that of Carter's Heirs v. Cutting
    Search
  11. of a statute which is clearly within its words and perfectly consistent with its intent. The case of Young v. Bank
    Search
  12. to determine upon its merits the validity of the probate of a will. Page 134 U. S. 56 The case of Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  13. The case of Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  14. The case, in almost every particular, is identical with that of Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  15. Neither of the above cases involved the precise question now under examination. The decision in Carter's Heirs v. Cutting
    Search
  16. court, and that the final order of the latter court could be reexamined in this Court. The decision in both Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  17. Ness and Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  18. a will to probate and record is a final judgment cannot, it seems to us, be disputed. It was so declared in Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  19. the final judgment in which, as held in Carter's Heirs v. Cutting
    Search
  20. this Court to reexamine the final judgments or decrees of the highest court of this District. In the case of Custiss v. Georgetown
    Search
  21. of the United States held in the several states. And we may repeat here what Chief Justice Marshall said in Young v. Bank
    Search
  22. orders, whether, in its special or general term, the orders of that court. As was said in Metropolitan Railroad Co. v. Moore
    Search
  23. of this Court attaches. And in exercising that jurisdiction, this Court will not, as it was asked to do in Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  24. Ness and in Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Ormsby v. Webb
    Search
  26. Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  27. and Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  28. of Carter's Heirs v. Cutting
    Search
  29. of Young v. Bank
    Search
  30. of Van Ness v. Van
    Search
  31. of Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  32. of Custiss v. Georgetown
    Search
  33. In Railroad Co. v. Church
    Search
  34. Young v. Bank
    Search
  35. Brown v. Wiley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial