Citation network
Hans Vs. Louisiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 03, 1890
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1890) Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
upon a suggestion that the case is one that arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Page 134 U. S. 4 By the judgment of the court, this exception was sustained, and the suit was dismissed. See Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
or laws of the United States, is clearly established by the decisions of this Court in several recent cases. Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
to be sued by a citizen of another State or of a foreign country. That decision was made in the case of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
understood the effect of the Amendment, for, after its adoption, Attorney General Lee, in the case of Hollingsworth v. VirginiaSearch
-
was in accord rather with the minority than with the majority of the Court in the decision of the case of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
properly susceptible of litigation in courts. Looking back from our present standpoint at the decision in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of a foreign state. Adhering to the mere letter, it might be so, and so, in fact, the Supreme Court held in Chisholm v. PageSearch
-
between States as to boundary lines, and other questions admitting of judicial solution. And yet the case of Penn v. LordSearch
-
public law, are not subjects of judicial cognizance, this Court has often declined to take jurisdiction. See Wisconsin v. InsuranceSearch
-
It was fully shown by an exhaustive examination of the old law by Mr. Justice Iredell in his opinion in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
even in the cases which have gone furthest in sustaining suits against the officers or agents of States. Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Board of Liquidators v. McCombSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
In Briscoe v. BankSearch
-
said Mr. Justice Miller in Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
Undoubtedly a State may be sued by its own consent, as was the case in Curran v. ArkansasSearch
-
et al., 15 How. 304, 56 U. S. 309 , and in Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
law which the legislature passed in conformity to the Constitution of that State. But this Court decided, in Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
The same doctrine was held in Railroad Company v. TennesseeSearch
-
Railroad Company v. AlabamaSearch
-
It is true that the same qualification existed in the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was before the court in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
this regard. Some reliance is placed by the plaintiff upon the observations of Chief Justice Marshall in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
But I cannot give my assent to many things said in the opinion. The comments made upon the decision in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
of the United States. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of Hollingsworth v. VirginiaSearch
-
Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Chisholm v. PageSearch
-
of Penn v. LordSearch
-
See Wisconsin v. InsuranceSearch
-
of States. Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
Curran v. ArkansasSearch
-
Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
Railroad Company v. TennesseeSearch
-
Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial