Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Little Vs. Bowers

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 07, 1890

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 1 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Lord Vs. Veazie US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  2. U.S. 547 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Little v. Bowers
    Search
  3. U.S. 547 (1890) Little v. Bowers
    Search
  4. was legally assessed, leaves no existing cause of action, and requires the dismissal of the writ of error. Robertson v. Bradbury
    Search
  5. in error was an involuntary payment or a payment under duress within the meaning of the law. In Wabaunsee County v. Walker
    Search
  6. Kan. 431, cited with approval in Lamborn v. County
    Search
  7. Commissioners, 97 U. S. 181 , and also in Railroad Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  8. decision of the question of their liability. As to this class of cases, Chief Justice Shaw states the rule, in Preston v. Boston
    Search
  9. extinguish the controversy between the parties to this suit. This case is clearly distinguishable from Robertson v. Bradbury
    Search
  10. involving real and substantial rights between the parties to the record, the case will be dismissed. In Lord v. Veazie
    Search
  11. In Cleveland v. Chamberlain
    Search
  12. Black 419, the rule laid down in Lord v. Veazie
    Search
  13. of all the appellee's interest in the decree appealed from, and the appeal was dismissed. In Wood Paper Co. v. Heft
    Search
  14. not been compromised did not affect the propriety of the dismissal. Page 134 U. S. 558 In San Mateo County v. Southern
    Search
  15. longer an existing cause of action in favor of the county against the railroad company. To the same effect, see Henkin v. Guerss
    Search
  16. Smith v. Junction
    Search
  17. Freeholders of Essex v. Freeholders
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Little v. Bowers
    Search
  19. Robertson v. Bradbury
    Search
  20. In Wabaunsee County v. Walker
    Search
  21. Lamborn v. County
    Search
  22. Railroad Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  23. Preston v. Boston
    Search
  24. In Lord v. Veazie
    Search
  25. In Wood Paper Co. v. Heft
    Search
  26. In San Mateo County v. Southern
    Search
  27. Henkin v. Guerss
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial