Citation network
Thompson Vs. Phenix Ins. Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1890
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Thompson v. PhenixSearch
-
Ins. Co. - 136 U.S. 287 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Thompson v. PhenixSearch
-
Ins. Co., 136 U.S. 287 (1890) Thompson v. PhenixSearch
-
of the Court. This suit was brought July 10, 1885, by the appellant, who is the receiver in the case of Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
E. S. Kearney, receiver for Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
up to and including the 19th of May, 1884, Edward S. Kearney was the receiver in the above suit of Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
pending the suit of Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
and refused to comply with any of those requests. By an order entered July 9, 1885, in the suit of Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
to incur expenses or liability for insurance premiums. In support of this proposition, its counsel cites Cowdrey v. GalvestonSearch
-
as receiver for Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
although his use of the funds in his hands for that purpose was subject to the approval of the court. In Tempest v. OrdSearch
-
Upon this point, Brown v. HazlehurstSearch
-
the necessity of resorting to extrinsic proof. The case made by the amended bill is within the decision in Snell v. InsuranceSearch
-
legal sense is the property in his possession. It is in the possession of the court, by him as its officer. Wiswall v. SampsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Heidritter v. ElizabethSearch
-
Chicago Union Bank v. KansasSearch
-
recognized in all the authorities, is a just one, because those instruments are drawn by the company. National Bank v. InsuranceSearch
-
out of its provisions may be sustained. While the validity of such a stipulation cannot be disputed, Riddlesbarger v. HartfordSearch
-
term of twelve months from the date when he could demand, as of right, that his claim for loss be satisfied. Vette v. ClintonSearch
-
Steen v. NiagaraSearch
-
Spare v. HomeSearch
-
Mayor v. HamiltonSearch
-
Hay v. StarSearch
-
of the fire, was due to the conduct of the company, it cannot avail itself of the limitation of twelve months. Curtis v. HomeSearch
-
Ide v. PhoenixSearch
-
Grant v. LexingtonSearch
-
Mickey v. BurlingtonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Thompson v. PhenixSearch
-
of Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
Holladay v. HolladaySearch
-
Cowdrey v. GalvestonSearch
-
In Tempest v. OrdSearch
-
Brown v. HazlehurstSearch
-
Snell v. InsuranceSearch
-
National Bank v. InsuranceSearch
-
Riddlesbarger v. HartfordSearch
-
Vette v. ClintonSearch
-
Curtis v. HomeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial