Citation network
Mcgahey Vs. Virginia
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1890
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 662 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court McGahey v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. 662 (1890) McGahey v. VirginiaSearch
-
Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia Syllabus the Decisions Hartman V. GreenhowSearch
-
authority of its prior decisions whatever may have been the former views of any member of the Court. In McGahey v. VirginiaSearch
-
Bryan v. VirginiaSearch
-
and Cooper v. VirginiaSearch
-
well as the acts which require their rejection, are not laws impairing the obligation of the contract. In Ellett v. VirginiaSearch
-
of suit, the taxpayer is entitled to tender coupons in payment of the costs, as well as of the taxes. In Cuthbert v. VirginiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
regard to the obligations of the state is unreasonable, and impairs the obligations of the contract. In Hucless v. ChildreySearch
-
the state with the holders of the coupons of its bonds that they shall be received in payment of taxes. In Vashon v. GreenhowSearch
-
impair, and such was, for several years, the uniform holding of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. See Antoni v. WrightSearch
-
Wise v. RogersSearch
-
Clarke v. TylerSearch
-
argument to this effect is contained in the opinion of the court tendered in one of the cases now before us, Vashon v. GreenhowSearch
-
solemn engagement of the state, to use them in payment of state taxes and public dues. This was determined in Hartman v. GreenhowSearch
-
in Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
banks, and repealing all other acts inconsistent therewith. This law was under consideration in the case of Antoni v. WrightSearch
-
of taxes and state dues, and that the act of 1872, so far as it conflicted with this contract, was void. In Clarke v. TylerSearch
-
Grattan 134, decided in 1878, it was said that this decision in Antoni v. WrightSearch
-
the holders of the coupons. The validity of this act came before this Court for consideration in the case of Hartman v. GreenhowSearch
-
tax paying coupons of 1871 and 1879. One of these bills, approved the 14th of January, 1882, recited in full in Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
the act of January 26th. The validity of these acts came before this Court for consideration in the case of Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
et seq., came before this Court for consideration. There were eight of these cases. One of them, Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
same. The Court distinguished this remedy of the taxpayer from that which was in question in the case of Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
tax, after having duly tendered coupons in payment thereof. Therefore, without expressly overruling the case of Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
opinion on the part of the Chief Justice and three of the Associate Justices. Two other of the Coupon Cases, White v. GreenhowSearch
-
and Chaffin v. TaylorSearch
-
they had tendered coupons in payment thereof, and were in all substantial respects similar to the case of Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
and were decided in the same way. In one of them ( Chaffin v. TaylorSearch
-
s property, and the decree was affirmed by this Court upon the same grounds which were taken in the case of Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
The fifth case ( Carter v. GreenhowSearch
-
because the right claimed was not one of the rights referred to in that section. The sixth case, Pleasants v. GreenhowSearch
-
for on the same ground of deprivation of rights which was preferred as the cause of action in the case of Carter v. GreenhowSearch
-
its decree was affirmed by this Court for the same reason which prevailed in that case. The seventh case was Marye v. ParsonsSearch
-
of the state to receive coupons in payment of such taxes and demands. The remaining case was that of Moore v. GreenhowSearch
-
Court of Richmond, and its decision was affirmed, in conformity with the conclusion arrived at in the case of Anotoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
other coupon cases came before this Court in October term, 1885, and were decided in February, 1886. They were Barry v. EdmundsSearch
-
U. S. 572 , and Sands v. EdmundsSearch
-
Court contained in the coupon cases decided in the previous year, except perhaps in deciding, in the case of Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
of the act of 1871, and payable in coupons attached to bonds issued under that act. In another case, Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
it in payment of taxes, etc., and that this showed a good tender, and brought the case within the ruling in Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
us. It remains to apply the law as we conceive it to be to the several cases now under consideration. Bryan v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McGahey v. VirginiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial