Citation network
Amy Vs. Watertown
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 08, 1889
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 301 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Amy v. WatertownSearch
-
U.S. 301 (1889) Amy v. WatertownSearch
-
be made upon some other substituted officer, and this Court concurs with that court in this construction. Broughton v. PensacolaSearch
-
U. S. 266 , and Mobile v. WatsonSearch
-
and the consent of the court, it was then heard, together with a similar motion in the case of Worts and others v. TheSearch
-
common law prevailed or the local law provided for the case, and prevented a vacancy. Such were the cases of Badger v. BollesSearch
-
Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
Salamanca v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 627 . In Badger v. BollesSearch
-
state the officers elected were to hold their offices until their successors were elected and qualified. In Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the proper authority accepts it or does something tantamount thereto such as appointing a successor. In Salamanca v. WilsonSearch
-
provisions of the statute law are decisive, and preclude the operation of any such rule as was recognized in Badger v. BollesSearch
-
and Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
be followed, and the rule is especially Page 130 U. S. 317 exacting in reference to corporations. Kibbe v. BensonSearch
-
Evans v. DublinSearch
-
Walton v. UniversalSearch
-
Brydolf v. WolfSearch
-
Hoen v. AtlanticSearch
-
Lehigh Valley Ins. Co. v. FullerSearch
-
Penn.St. 398. The courts of Wisconsin strictly adhere to this rule. Congar v. RailroadSearch
-
City of Watertown v. RobinsonSearch
-
we always feel strongly disposed to give great weight to the decisions of the highest tribunal of the state. Burgess v. SeligmanSearch
-
entered into with them by private parties cannot deprive the State of this paramount authority. See Meriwether v. GarrettSearch
-
U. S. 472 . The cases of Broughton v. PensacolaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Amy v. WatertownSearch
-
and Mobile v. WatsonSearch
-
of Badger v. BollesSearch
-
In Badger v. BollesSearch
-
In Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
In Salamanca v. WilsonSearch
-
Badger v. BollesSearch
-
Congar v. RailroadSearch
-
See Meriwether v. GarrettSearch
-
of Broughton v. PensacolaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial