Citation network
Gumbel Vs. Pitkin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 09, 1888
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 131 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Gumbel v. PitkinSearch
-
U.S. 131 (1888) Gumbel v. PitkinSearch
-
by leave of the court, and with it a transcript of the proceedings in the civil district court in the case of Gumbel v. DreyfusSearch
-
state court, subsequently served by the garnishment process. The authorities for this proposition cited are Patterson v. StephensonSearch
-
unreported, decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri at the April term, 1883, and Bates v. DaysSearch
-
if one existed. In this state, the courts are to be guided by the doctrine which is settled by the cases of Hagan v. LucasSearch
-
Pet. 400, and Taylor v. CarrylSearch
-
by another officer of and under process from the court of another jurisdiction. The authorities are collated in Wilmer v. AtlantaSearch
-
by petition in this action was justified by the laws of Louisiana and by the decision of this Court in Freeman v. HoweSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
How. 450. In Krippendorf v. HydeSearch
-
to protect their own jurisdiction and officers in the possession of property that is in the custody of the law. Buck v. ColbathSearch
-
the intervention of the stranger to the action in his own interest as what Mr. Justice Story calls in Clarke v. MathewsonSearch
-
In the subsequent case of Covell v. HeymanSearch
-
So in Lammon v. FeusierSearch
-
creditors, the court would permit a defense to be made by the creditors in the name of the defendant, Buckman v. BuckmanSearch
-
might move to dismiss a prior attachment on the ground that there was no such person as the plaintiff therein, Kimball v. WellingtonSearch
-
may come in and defend against a senior attachment by showing that the debt for which it issued had been paid. McCluny v. JacksonSearch
-
Grattan 96. In Smith v. GettingerSearch
-
of the common defendant. In Massachusetts, provision is made for appropriate relief in such cases by statute. Lodge v. LodgeSearch
-
Carter v. GregorySearch
-
Baird v. WilliamsSearch
-
Swift v. CrockerSearch
-
Pick. 241. The case of Paradise v. Farmers'Search
-
court for the adjudication of their rights parties not otherwise subject to its jurisdiction. So that in Krippendorf v. HydeSearch
-
In the case of Bates v. DaysSearch
-
The same principle is asserted by the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri in the case of Patterson v. StephensonSearch
-
In Tomlinson v. CollinsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gumbel v. PitkinSearch
-
of Gumbel v. DreyfusSearch
-
Patterson v. StephensonSearch
-
and Bates v. DaysSearch
-
of Hagan v. LucasSearch
-
and Taylor v. CarrylSearch
-
Wilmer v. AtlantaSearch
-
In Krippendorf v. HydeSearch
-
of Covell v. HeymanSearch
-
Buckman v. BuckmanSearch
-
Kimball v. WellingtonSearch
-
McCluny v. JacksonSearch
-
In Smith v. GettingerSearch
-
Lodge v. LodgeSearch
-
of Paradise v. Farmers'Search
-
of Bates v. DaysSearch
-
of Patterson v. StephensonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial