Citation network
Tilghman Vs. Proctor
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 19, 1888
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 136 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Tilghman v. ProctorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 136 (1888) Tilghman v. ProctorSearch
-
the Southern Districts of Ohio and of New York Page 125 U. S. 138 in 1862 and 1864 respectively. Tilghman v. WerkSearch
-
Tilghman v. MitchellSearch
-
in New York, a final decree for an account of profits was entered by the circuit court on September 1, 1871. Tilghman v. MitchellSearch
-
and that the use of an apparatus similar to that used by the present defendants was not an infringement. Mitchell v. TilghmanSearch
-
In the case at bar the circuit court, on December 2, 1874, following the decision of this Court in Mitchell v. TilghmanSearch
-
appeal from that decree, this Court at October term, 1880, by a unanimous opinion, overruled its decision in Mitchell v. TilghmanSearch
-
and the case remanded, with directions to enter a decree for the plaintiff in conformity with that opinion. Tilghman v. ProctorSearch
-
Jordan v. DobsonSearch
-
New York v. RansomSearch
-
Suffolk Co. v. HaydenSearch
-
Packet Co. v. SicklesSearch
-
Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSearch
-
Mevs v. ConoverSearch
-
Elizabeth v. PavementSearch
-
Root v. RailwaySearch
-
U.S. 94 U. S. 710 . In Mevs v. ConoverSearch
-
Pat.Off.Gaz. 1112, ante, 125 U. S. 145 , note. In Elizabeth v. PavementSearch
-
U.S. 97 U. S. 138 -139. In Root v. RailwaySearch
-
Co., that statement was repeated. And in Thomson v. WoosterSearch
-
courts of equity apply to the case of a trustee who has wrongfully used the trust property for his own advantage. Root v. RailwaySearch
-
Manufacturing Co. v. CowingSearch
-
the defendants that the limited construction given to Tilghman's patent by the decision of this Court in Mitchell v. TilghmanSearch
-
modified unless Page 125 U. S. 150 there clearly appears to have been error or mistake on his part. Medsker v. BonebrakeSearch
-
Donnell v. ColumbiaSearch
-
Mason v. CrosbySearch
-
Paddock v. CommercialSearch
-
Richards v. ToddSearch
-
has the burden of proving the amount of profits that the defendants have made by the use of his invention. Blake v. RobertsonSearch
-
Dobson v. HartfordSearch
-
S. 444 -445. And the question to be determined is, as stated by Mr. Justice Strong in delivering judgment in Mowry v. WhitneySearch
-
damages, made no mention of interest, and has not been understood to affect the rule as previously announced. Silsby v. FooteSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Tilghman v. ProctorSearch
-
Tilghman v. WerkSearch
-
Mitchell v. TilghmanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial