Citation network
Enfield Vs. Jordan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 10, 1887
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 680 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Enfield v. JordanSearch
-
U.S. 680 (1887) Enfield v. JordanSearch
-
are one and the same thing. We1ch v. PostSearch
-
Ill. 471, overruled, and Martin v. PeopleSearch
-
were taken. It was also admitted by the plaintiff that the Enfield town bond represented by Post in the case of Welch v. PostSearch
-
the same thing were it not for the decision of the Supreme Court of that state to the contrary in the case of Welch v. PostSearch
-
dissented from this opinion and adhered to an earlier ruling of the court, made in 1877, in the case of Martin v. PeopleSearch
-
true construction of the law, and we feel compelled to say that we regard the views expressed in the case of Martin v. PeopleSearch
-
corporations, it does not save the power to make donations to them. We did so decide in the case of Town of Concord v. PortsmouthSearch
-
Savings Bank, 92 U. S. 625 , but in the subsequent case of Fairfield v. CountySearch
-
and not necessarily decided therein, it should have been allowed to do so, under the ruling of this Court in Cromwell v. SacSearch
-
It is admitted by the plaintiff in this suit that the Enfield town bond represented by Post in the case of Welch v. PostSearch
-
by lis pendens in relation to negotiable securities was considered by this Court in the cases of Warren County v. MarcySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 96 , and Carroll County v. SmithSearch
-
of negotiable securities or by the sale of articles in market overt in the usual course of trade. See Brooklyn v. InsuranceSearch
-
had no power to make them payable at any other place than the office of the town treasurer. For this they cite People v. CountySearch
-
Pekin v. ReynoldsSearch
-
Ill. 529, and Sherlock v. VillageSearch
-
that the bonds are illegally made payable at a bank in Chicago does not invalidate them, as was held in Johnson v. StarkSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Enfield v. JordanSearch
-
We1ch v. PostSearch
-
and Martin v. PeopleSearch
-
of Welch v. PostSearch
-
of Martin v. PeopleSearch
-
of Town of Concord v. PortsmouthSearch
-
of Fairfield v. CountySearch
-
Cromwell v. SacSearch
-
of Warren County v. MarcySearch
-
and Carroll County v. SmithSearch
-
See Brooklyn v. InsuranceSearch
-
People v. CountySearch
-
and Sherlock v. VillageSearch
-
Johnson v. StarkSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial