Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Rosenbaum Vs. Bauer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 07, 1887

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

60 entries 8 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Bath County Vs. Amy US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
    Relied / Followed
  2. Hess Vs. Reynolds US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1885
  3. The Secretary Vs. Mcgarrahan US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1869
  4. Graham Vs. Norton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
    Relied / Followed
  5. County of Greene Vs. Daniel US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  6. United States Vs. Schurz US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  7. Boom Company Vs. Patterson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  8. Gaines Vs. Fuentes US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  9. U.S. 450 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Rosenbaum v. Bauer
    Search
  10. U.S. 450 (1887) Rosenbaum v. Bauer
    Search
  11. that the circuit courts had no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in a case like the present. In McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  12. In McClung v. Silliman
    Search
  13. plaintiff in certain land. The writ was refused. In this Court, the case was sought to be distinguished from McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  14. speaking again by Mr. Justice Johnson, said that no just inference was to be drawn from the decision in McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  15. Consistently with the views in those cases, this Court, in Riggs v. Johnson
    Search
  16. complete the jurisdiction exercised by rendering the judgment. In many cases adjudged in this Court since McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  17. that case has been referred to as settling the law on the point to which it relates, as in The Secretary v. McGarrahan
    Search
  18. Wall. 244, and Heine v. Levee
    Search
  19. Commissioners, 19 Wall. 655. In Bath County v. Amy
    Search
  20. The same doctrine was applied in Graham v. Norton
    Search
  21. principles have been asserted by this Court in cases arising since the Act of March 3, 1875, as in County of Greene v. Daniel
    Search
  22. in United States v. Schurz
    Search
  23. in Davenport v. County
    Search
  24. of Dodge, 105 U. S. 237 , 105 U. S. 242 -243, and in Louisiana v. Jumel
    Search
  25. had the assignment not been made, as illustrated by the cases cited by the plaintiff in error of City of Lexington v. Butler
    Search
  26. Wall. 282, and Claflin v. Commonwealth
    Search
  27. Ins. Co., 110 U. S. 81 . In Gaines v. Fuentes
    Search
  28. restriction of the statute in respect to that writ was applicable. The same remark may be made as to Boom Company v. Patterson
    Search
  29. U. S. 403 , where the removal proceeding was one to condemn lands for the use of a boom company, and as to Hess v. Reynolds
    Search
  30. a proceeding in a probate court to obtain payment of a claim against the estate of a deceased person, and as to Bliven v. New
    Search
  31. England Screw Co., 3 Blatchford 111, and Barney v. Globe
    Search
  32. exists, of a like proceeding by mandamus. As was said by this Court, speaking by MR. JUSTICE MILLER, in Hess v. Reynolds
    Search
  33. been formed between definite parties, we have held that the controversy came under the head of a suit at law. Gaines v. Fuentes
    Search
  34. a civil suit at law, no matter by what name it is called -- certainly as much so as were the proceedings in Gaines v. Fuentes
    Search
  35. already cited, and in Boom Company v. Patterson
    Search
  36. S. 404 , where there was an issue to ascertain the value of property taken by virtue of eminent domain. In Davies v. Corbin
    Search
  37. is a civil action. It is only necessary to refer to the cases to show that this point is beyond all dispute. Perry v. Ames
    Search
  38. Cariaga v. Dryden
    Search
  39. Courtwright v. Bear
    Search
  40. Knowles v. Yates
    Search
  41. People v. Kern
    Search
  42. People v. Thompson
    Search
  43. if in conflict with it. The two cases to which we have referred as decided since the act are County of Greene v. Daniel
    Search
  44. U. S. 187 , and Davenport v. County
    Search
  45. U.S. Supreme Court Rosenbaum v. Bauer
    Search
  46. In McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  47. McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  48. Riggs v. Johnson
    Search
  49. and Heine v. Levee
    Search
  50. In Bath County v. Amy
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial