Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Metropolitan Railroad Co. Vs. Moore

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 02, 1887

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 27 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 558 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Metropolitan Railroad Co. v. Moore
    Search
  2. U.S. 558 (1887) Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore
    Search
  3. legal discretion of that court respecting the disposition of such a motion is not reviewable in this Court. Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  4. in argument at the bar that this was because, a few Page 121 U. S. 562 weeks before, in the case of Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  5. Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  6. as used in that section. Upon this point, the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  7. Griffith v. Diffenderffer
    Search
  8. Md. 466. To the same effect is the language in 40 N.Y.Superior Ct. (8 Jones & Spencer) 181, Helping v. Third
    Search
  9. proof so potent as to leave no reasonable doubt of the opposing conclusion. This is illustrated by the case of Algeo v. Duncan
    Search
  10. sufficient evidence, because it is against the weight of the evidence. Therefore it was said by this Court in Randall v. Baltimore
    Search
  11. This was the very point determined in the case just referred to, of Algeo v. Duncan
    Search
  12. N.Y. 313, and in McDonald v. Walter
    Search
  13. N.Y. 551. The Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, however, in Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  14. to limit the appeal originating in them to the cases particularly mentioned. The language of the court in Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  15. Pr.Rep. 211, Algeo v. Duncan
    Search
  16. words, we think that Congress adopted for this purpose the law of New York as it was understood in New York. McDonald v. Hovey
    Search
  17. are not entitled to the weight which was given to them by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Metropolitan Railroad Co. v. Moore
    Search
  19. Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore
    Search
  20. Court. Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  21. of Stewart v. Elliott
    Search
  22. Helping v. Third
    Search
  23. of Algeo v. Duncan
    Search
  24. Randall v. Baltimore
    Search
  25. McDonald v. Walter
    Search
  26. Algeo v. Duncan
    Search
  27. New York. McDonald v. Hovey
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial