Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Harshman Vs. Knox County

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 27, 1887

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 1 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Labette County Commissioners Vs. Moulton US Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1884
  2. Harshman v. Knox
    Search
  3. County - 122 U.S. 306 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Harshman v. Knox
    Search
  4. County, 122 U.S. 306 (1887) Harshman v. Knox
    Search
  5. of an execution, nothing can be alleged by the respondent to contradict the record of the judgment. Ralls County v. United
    Search
  6. County v. Dennis
    Search
  7. Chouteau v. Allen
    Search
  8. for the purpose of paying bonds issued in pursuance thereof, and that without limit as to its amount. United States v. County
    Search
  9. upon the judgment, its effect as an estoppel is determined by the first branch of the rule as laid down in Cromwell v. County
    Search
  10. And as stated in Burlen v. Shannon
    Search
  11. Gifford v. Thorn
    Search
  12. cases as the present, is a remedy in the nature of an execution for the purpose of collecting the judgment. Riggs v. Johnson
    Search
  13. Thompson v. United
    Search
  14. the record of the judgment can be alleged in a proceeding at law for its collection by execution. In Ralls County v. United
    Search
  15. could lawfully be raised for that purpose. It has been in effect so decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri in State v. Rainey
    Search
  16. be limited in its mandate only by that which the judgment itself declares. It was said, however, in Ralls County v. United
    Search
  17. in their official capacity, as well as the county itself, because, as was said in Labette County Commissioners v. Moulton
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Harshman v. Knox
    Search
  19. Ralls County v. United
    Search
  20. United States v. County
    Search
  21. Cromwell v. County
    Search
  22. Burlen v. Shannon
    Search
  23. Riggs v. Johnson
    Search
  24. In Ralls County v. United
    Search
  25. State v. Rainey
    Search
  26. Supervisors v. Durant
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial