Citation network
Coffee Vs. Groover
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 17, 1887
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Coffee v. GrooverSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1887) Coffee v. GrooverSearch
-
pleas of matter affecting the legal title or in estoppel only encumber the record and tend to embarrassment. Wade v. DoyleSearch
-
Neal v. SpoonerSearch
-
of parts of a disputed territory in its possession are valid against the state which had the right, Dela Croix v. ChamberlainSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
by treaty, cession, or conquest, the rights of the inhabitants to property are respected and sacred. Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Clarke, 8 Pet. 436, 33 U. S. 445 . And the principle applies to the states of this union. Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
public domain before the cession. This principle is asserted in the cases of Page 123 U. S. 10 United States v. ArredondoSearch
-
Delassus v. UnitedSearch
-
How. 17, and Leitensdorfer v. WebbSearch
-
How. 176. In United States v. PerchemanSearch
-
In December term, 1854, the Attorney General was allowed to intervene on the part of the United States. Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
territory did not belong to Spain, though she occupied it and claimed to own it. This point is decided in Henderson v. Poindexter'sSearch
-
Lessee, 12 Wheat. 530, followed by Hickey v. StewartSearch
-
How. 627, and other cases. In Henderson v. PoindexterSearch
-
by this Court on the subject was accurately expressed by Mr. Justice McLean in delivering the opinion in Robinson v. MinorSearch
-
decision was invariably against their validity. The first case in which the question arose was that of Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
contended for the line of the Perdido, and had finally taken full possession of the country. The case of Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
was followed in the subsequent cases of Garcia v. LeeSearch
-
United States v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Montault v. UnitedSearch
-
How. 437, all of which are referred to, and the history of the controversy is given, in United States v. LyndeSearch
-
is dropped that the existence of a government de facto would have any influence on the decision. In Garcia v. LeeSearch
-
the territory of another, and if a proposition so evident needed confirmation, it will be found in the case of Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
The case of Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
were not rightfully made because they were originally beyond their territorial boundary. The case of Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
grant is a dictum of Mr. Justice Baldwin in delivering the opinion of the Court in the case of Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
as the authority to make it was derived from the legislative power only. The same objection was overruled in Penn v. BaltimoreSearch
-
and in Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
U. S. 31 already cited in relation to Spanish grants in Mississippi and West Florida and to the case of Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
authority referred to, 12 Wheat. 25 U. S. 600 -601, it is a mere dictum of Mr. Justice Trimble in De la Croix v. ChamberlainSearch
-
clearly inconsistent with the decision made at the same term in Henderson v. Poindexter'sSearch
-
No such question was raised in that case, and Poole v. FleegerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Coffee v. GrooverSearch
-
Wade v. DoyleSearch
-
Dela Croix v. ChamberlainSearch
-
and Leitensdorfer v. WebbSearch
-
In United States v. PerchemanSearch
-
of the United States. Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Henderson v. Poindexter'sSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial