Citation network
Oelbermann Vs. Meritt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 21, 1887
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 356 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Oelbermann v. MerittSearch
-
U.S. 356 (1887) Oelbermann v. MerittSearch
-
to decide between the two appraisers, if they disagree. It was held by this Court in Hilton v. MerrittSearch
-
had been complied with in this respect has been determined by the decisions of this Court in like cases. In Greeley v. ThompsonSearch
-
same character with the inquiry into the competency of the merchant appraiser in the present case. In Converse v. BurgessSearch
-
an award with a view to show that by the terms of the submission, he was not authorized to make the award, Woodbury v. NorthySearch
-
as to the fact that the arbitrators did not examine or act upon a certain matter, Roop v. BrubackerSearch
-
U. S. 368 at or during the arbitration, and which tend to show the award to be void for legal cause, Strong v. StrongSearch
-
Cush. 560, 576, and as to whether a certain claim was included in the award, Hale v. HuseSearch
-
Gray 99. See also Spurck v. CrookSearch
-
of a tribunal, called a jury, appointed to assess damages and apportion benefits in the widening of a street, Bank v. MayorSearch
-
Wend. 244, and in the case of commissioners appointed to condemn land for railroad purposes, Marquette Railroad Co. v. ProbateSearch
-
Judge, 53 Mich. 217. In Duke of Buccleuch v. MetropolitanSearch
-
with the statute as to examination within the terms of the protest. This the plaintiffs had a right to show. In Greely v. ThompsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to law, and did not justify the penalty, and the propriety of this instruction was approved by this Court. In Converse v. BurgessSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Oelbermann v. MerittSearch
-
In Greeley v. ThompsonSearch
-
In Converse v. BurgessSearch
-
Woodbury v. NorthySearch
-
Roop v. BrubackerSearch
-
Strong v. StrongSearch
-
Hale v. HuseSearch
-
Spurck v. CrookSearch
-
Bank v. MayorSearch
-
Marquette Railroad Co. v. ProbateSearch
-
In Duke of Buccleuch v. MetropolitanSearch
-
In Greely v. ThompsonSearch
-
Court. In Converse v. BurgessSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial