Citation network
Litchfield Vs. Goodnow's Administrator
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 05, 1887
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Litchfield v. Goodnow'sSearch
-
Administrator - 123 U.S. 549 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Litchfield v. Goodnow'sSearch
-
Administrator, 123 U.S. 549 (1887) Litchfield v. Goodnow'sSearch
-
U.S. 549 Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa Syllabus Stryker V. GoodnowSearch
-
ante, 123 U. S. 527 , applied as to the effect of Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
Moines Co., 5 Wall. 681. The plaintiff in error's intestate was not a party to Homestead Company v. ValleySearch
-
assignees were not bound. This was a suit to recover taxes paid under circumstances which are set forth in Stryker v. GoodnowSearch
-
ante, 123 U. S. 527 . The cause was argued with Stryker v. GoodnowSearch
-
the Des Moines Navigation and Railroad Company. For a general statement of the facts, reference is made to Stryker v. CraneSearch
-
U. S. 527 . The taxes were paid before the decree in Homestead Page 123 U. S. 550 Company v. ValleySearch
-
in that case was pleaded in bar and also the statute of limitations, based on the decision as to title in Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
Moines Company, 5 Wall. 681, the same as in Stryker v. CraneSearch
-
supreme court of the state, and judgment was entered in that court for the amount of taxes paid, and interest. Goodnow v. LitchfieldSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
arising on the statute of limitations, it is only necessary to refer to what was said on that subject in Stryker v. CraneSearch
-
The correctness of this statement has been often affirmed by this Court, Lovejoy v. MurraySearch
-
Robbins v. ChicagoSearch
-
indeed, it is elementary, Hale v. FinchSearch
-
Railroad Company v. NationalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Litchfield v. Goodnow'sSearch
-
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa Syllabus Stryker V. GoodnowSearch
-
of Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
Homestead Company v. ValleySearch
-
Stryker v. GoodnowSearch
-
Stryker v. CraneSearch
-
Company v. ValleySearch
-
Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
Goodnow v. LitchfieldSearch
-
Court, Lovejoy v. MurraySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial