Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Stryker Vs. Goodnow's Administrator

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 05, 1887

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 49 unlinked
Show
  1. Stryker v. Goodnow's
    Search
  2. Administrator - 123 U.S. 527 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Stryker v. Goodnow's
    Search
  3. Administrator, 123 U.S. 527 (1887) Stryker v. Goodnow's
    Search
  4. the decision of the highest court of the Iowa is conclusive, and it is not reviewable here. Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  5. but it is no bar as an estoppel to the recovery in these cases. The judgment of this Court in Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  6. Pacific Railroad v. Litchfield
    Search
  7. Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  8. Williams v. Page
    Search
  9. Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  10. Railroad, 17 Wall. 153, and Wolsey v. Chapman
    Search
  11. decided by this Court, April 9, 1860, that the river grant did not extend above the Fork. Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. Litchfield
    Search
  12. Wolcott Page 123 U. S. 530 under this deed from the navigation and railroad company had not failed. Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  13. facts. A decree was thereupon entered affirming a decree of the circuit court dismissing the bill. Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  14. additional defense was made, to-wit, that the decision of this court at December term, 1866, in the case of Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  15. the taxes sued for. To reverse those judgments these writs of error were brought. The cases are reported as Goodnow v. Stryker
    Search
  16. Goodnow v. Chapman
    Search
  17. Goodnow v. Litchfield
    Search
  18. Goodnow v. Wells
    Search
  19. and void, because levied in violation of that act of Congress. 2. That the decree in the case of Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  20. Court acting under the authority of the United States. 3. That the judgment of the Court in the case of Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  21. Iowa to prevent the levy of the taxes for 1861 as soon as the resolution of March 2, 1861, went into effect. Goodnow v. Wells
    Search
  22. Ia. 654. This, it was said, is in accordance with previous cases bearing on the same question, among which Stryker v. Polk
    Search
  23. County, 22 Ia. 131, and Litchfield v. Hamilton
    Search
  24. of the state court on that question is final, and not reviewable here. We are referred, however, to Litchfield v. County
    Search
  25. that county and held under a title similar to that in these cases. The supreme court of the state decided ( Litchfield v. County
    Search
  26. regular call of the docket. A few days before this submission was made, an appeal in the suit of Edwin C. Litchfield v. County
    Search
  27. Hamilton County case for the tax of 1861. The supreme court of the state has also decided in the case of Goodnow v. Wells
    Search
  28. Railroad Co. v. Brown
    Search
  29. opinion the conclusion then reached by us received further support from the cases of Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railway v. Cherokee
    Search
  30. Goodrich v. Beaman
    Search
  31. Ia. 563, and Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railway v. Woodbury
    Search
  32. the highest court of the state is conclusive. 2. As to the estoppel by the decree in the case of Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  33. fail in its decision to give full faith and credit to that decree. 3. As to the effect of the judgment in Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  34. company or those claiming under that company. That decision is indeed referred to in the case of Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  35. and as to any other parties, it stood, in the language of MR. JUSTICE MILLER in Williams Page 123 U. S. 540 v. Baker
    Search
  36. U.S. Supreme Court Stryker v. Goodnow's
    Search
  37. of Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. Litchfield
    Search
  38. and Wolsey v. Chapman
    Search
  39. the Fork. Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. Litchfield
    Search
  40. of Wolcott v. Des
    Search
  41. Goodnow v. Stryker
    Search
  42. of Homestead Company v. Valley
    Search
  43. Stryker v. Polk
    Search
  44. and Litchfield v. Hamilton
    Search
  45. Litchfield v. County
    Search
  46. of Edwin C. Litchfield v. County
    Search
  47. of Goodnow v. Wells
    Search
  48. of Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railway v. Cherokee
    Search
  49. and Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railway v. Woodbury
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial