Citation network
Smith Vs. Whitney
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 04, 1886
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 167 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. WhitneySearch
-
U.S. 167 (1886) Smith v. WhitneySearch
-
Stat. 443. The objection, founded on Kurtz v. MoffittSearch
-
term of the office would exceed the sum named in the statute defining its appellate jurisdiction. Columbian Ins. Co. v. WheelrightSearch
-
United States v. AddisonSearch
-
of London v. CoxSearch
-
Worthington v. JeffriesSearch
-
Chambers v. GreenSearch
-
L.R. 20 Eq. 552, 555. See also Weston v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Lord Holt, in Blackborough v. DavisSearch
-
Montgomery v. BlairSearch
-
petition, with costs, which could not have been awarded upon a judgment of dismissal for want of jurisdiction. Mayor v. CooperSearch
-
of Columbia is authorized to issue writs of prohibition on the same grounds on which it was held in United States v. SchurzSearch
-
powers formerly exercised by the courts of Maryland, which, as declared by the court of appeals of that state in Price v. StateSearch
-
Thomson v. TracySearch
-
Connecticut River Railroad v. FranklinSearch
-
several states in the exercise of their inherent jurisdiction to issue writs of prohibition to courts-martial. Grant v. GouldSearch
-
State v. WakelySearch
-
State v. StevensSearch
-
Washburn v. PhillipsSearch
-
and duty, cannot be controlled or reviewed in the civil courts by writ of prohibition or otherwise. Dynes v. HooverSearch
-
Keyes v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 487 , 115 U. S. 500 . See also Wise v. WithersSearch
-
Meade v. DeputySearch
-
Barrett v. HopkinsSearch
-
F. 312. In the leading case of Grant v. GouldSearch
-
Porret's Case, Perry's Orient Cases 414, 419. So in Martin v. NottSearch
-
The same view, as regarding naval courts-martial, was asserted and acted on by this Court Dynes v. HooverSearch
-
United States v. MauriceSearch
-
charges and specifications laid before it, and the case comes within the rule stated by Chief Justice Shaw in Washburn v. PhillipsSearch
-
and the same sentence may be awarded on the first charge as upon both, a writ of prohibition should not issue. Enraght v. PenzanceSearch
-
charge and whether it would have jurisdiction of the second, if that were the only one, is immaterial. In Dynes v. HooverSearch
-
framed as to bring the party within the Articles of War, but that it agreed with Lord Loughborough's remark in Grant v. GouldSearch
-
Runkle v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. WhitneySearch
-
Columbian Ins. Co. v. WheelrightSearch
-
Weston v. CitySearch
-
Blackborough v. DavisSearch
-
Mayor v. CooperSearch
-
Price v. StateSearch
-
Grant v. GouldSearch
-
of Grant v. GouldSearch
-
Martin v. NottSearch
-
Court Dynes v. HooverSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial