Citation network
Royall Vs. Virginia
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 01, 1886
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 572 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. 572 (1886) Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
It is admitted as evidence in the case of the Commonwealth v. RoyallSearch
-
which would have that effect if enforced is thereby annulled and made void. To this point are the cases of Antoni v. WrightSearch
-
Wise v. RogersSearch
-
Grattan 169, and Clarke v. TylerSearch
-
Grattan 134, in the Court of Appeals of Virginia, and in this Court the cases of Hartman v. GreenhowSearch
-
U. S. 769 , and Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
U. S. 270 . In Hartman v. GreenhowSearch
-
was a surrender by Page 116 U. S. 579 its creditors of one-third of their claim against the state. In Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
P. 107 U. S. 771 . In Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a proposition founded on the authority of Woodruff v. TrapnallSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
Taxey v. IrwinSearch
-
U. S. 183 , and Hills v. ExchangeSearch
-
as used in the Act of March 30, 1871, does not seem to admit of reasonable doubt. In Clarke v. TylerSearch
-
payments were required and made for licenses issued under the internal revenue acts of the United States. McGuire v. CommonwealthSearch
-
referred to, issued under the internal revenue laws of the United States. We are referred to the case of Sights v. YarnallsSearch
-
however, on this point was definitely settled in accordance with the view we have here taken in the case of Ould v. CitySearch
-
of Richmond, 23 Grattan 464, followed by Humphreys v. CitySearch
-
of Norfolk, 25 Grattan 97, and Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CitySearch
-
of Richmond, 26 Grattan 1. In the case of Humphreys v. CitySearch
-
of Norfolk, ubi supra, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, referring to the previous case of Ould v. CitySearch
-
payment Page 116 U. S. 582 is a tax laid for revenue, and not an exaction for purposes of regulation. Mayor v. SecondSearch
-
State v. HobokenSearch
-
the tax. Cooley on Taxation 407. Such a license fee was held to be tax by this Court in the cases of Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Wall. 418, and Wilton v. MissouriSearch
-
secured to him by the Constitution. It is no answer to the objection of unconstitutionality, as was said in Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
of the Commonwealth v. RoyallSearch
-
of Antoni v. WrightSearch
-
and Clarke v. TylerSearch
-
of Hartman v. GreenhowSearch
-
and Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
In Hartman v. GreenhowSearch
-
In Antoni v. GreenhowSearch
-
In Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
of Woodruff v. TrapnallSearch
-
and Hills v. ExchangeSearch
-
In Clarke v. TylerSearch
-
of the United States. McGuire v. CommonwealthSearch
-
of Sights v. YarnallsSearch
-
of Ould v. CitySearch
-
Humphreys v. CitySearch
-
and Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CitySearch
-
of Humphreys v. CitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial