Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Graffam Vs. Burgess

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 01, 1886

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

46 entries 2 linked 44 unlinked
Show
  1. Byers Vs. Surget US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1856
  2. HardIn Vs. Boyd US Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1885
  3. U.S. 180 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Graffam v. Burgess
    Search
  4. U.S. 180 (1886) Graffam v. Burgess
    Search
  5. to diminish confidence in such sales, to keep bidders from attending, and to diminish the amount realized. White v. Wilson
    Search
  6. Williams v. Attleborough
    Search
  7. White v. Damon
    Search
  8. that always prevailed in England as to setting aside sales after the master's report had been confirmed. Livingston v. Byrne
    Search
  9. Williamson v. Dale
    Search
  10. Howell v. Baker
    Search
  11. Tiernan v. Wilson
    Search
  12. Duncan v. Dodd
    Search
  13. Collier v. Whipple
    Search
  14. Tripp v. Cook
    Search
  15. Lefevre v. Laraway
    Search
  16. Seaman v. Riggins
    Search
  17. Eberhart v. Gilchrist
    Search
  18. Campbell v. Gardner
    Search
  19. Marlatt v. Warwick
    Search
  20. Kloepping v. Stellmacher
    Search
  21. Wetzler v. Schaumann
    Search
  22. Surget v. Byers
    Search
  23. Andrews v. Scotton
    Search
  24. Glenn v. Clapp
    Search
  25. House v. Walker
    Search
  26. Young v. Teague
    Search
  27. White v. Floyd
    Search
  28. Hart v. Bleight
    Search
  29. Reed v. Carter
    Search
  30. Pierce v. Kneeland
    Search
  31. Montague v. Dawes
    Search
  32. Drinan v. Nichols
    Search
  33. of unfairness in the conduct of the party benefited by the sale to raise the presumption of fraud. In Howell v. Baker
    Search
  34. Page 117 U. S. 193 purchaser as a trustee for both parties, and allowed the debtor to redeem. In Kloepping v. Stellmacher
    Search
  35. The chancellor allowed the complainant to redeem the property by paying the purchase price and costs. Byers v. Surget
    Search
  36. the principles on which these cases rest are the same as in those of sale by the sheriff or other officer. In Drinan v. Nichols
    Search
  37. Kerr on Fraud, Am.Ed. 186. Chancellor Desaussure, in the case of Butler v. Haskell
    Search
  38. U. S. 764 . So a formal charge of fraud may be added when it is necessary and has been omitted. Wamburzee v. Kennedy
    Search
  39. U.S. Supreme Court Graffam v. Burgess
    Search
  40. White v. Wilson
    Search
  41. Livingston v. Byrne
    Search
  42. In Howell v. Baker
    Search
  43. In Kloepping v. Stellmacher
    Search
  44. In Drinan v. Nichols
    Search
  45. of Butler v. Haskell
    Search
  46. Wamburzee v. Kennedy
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial