Citation network
Hagood Vs. Southern
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 01, 1886
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 52 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Hagood v. SouthernSearch
-
U.S. 52 (1886) Hagood v. SouthernSearch
-
Page 117 U. S. 53 to compel its receipt for taxes unless he owes the taxes for which it is receivable. Marye v. ParsonsSearch
-
U. S. 325 , and Williams v. HagoodSearch
-
is substantially within the prohibition of the XIth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
between the same parties, in which the complainant's bill was dismissed without prejudice, and reported as Williams v. HagoodSearch
-
value occasioned thereby, are not actionable injuries. In this aspect, the case falls precisely within that of Marye v. ParsonsSearch
-
and does not materially differ from the case as made on the previous bill of Williams, and decided in Williams v. HagoodSearch
-
The case comes thus directly within the authority of Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
The principle which governs in these cases must be carefully distinguished from that which ruled in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
and Allen v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Ohio Railroad Co., 114 U. S. 311 -- a distinction which was pointed out in Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
ubi supra, and in Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
Co., 109 U. S. 446 . The rule for such cases was well stated by MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY in Board of Liquidation v. McCombSearch
-
And on the other hand, the rule for that class of cases was stated by THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
In such cases, as was said by Chief Justice Marshall in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
and void. Of such actions at law for redress of the wrong it was said by MR. JUSTICE MILLER in Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
Of such cases, that of United States v. LeeSearch
-
U. S. 196 , is a conspicuous example, and it was upon this ground that the judgment in Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
-
wrong, where the injury would be irreparable and there is no plain and adequate remedy at law, as was done in Allen v. BaltimoreSearch
-
FIELD and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, while adhering to the views expressed by them in their dissenting opinions in Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hagood v. SouthernSearch
-
and Williams v. HagoodSearch
-
the Constitution of the United States. Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
Williams v. HagoodSearch
-
of Marye v. ParsonsSearch
-
of Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Louisiana v. JumelSearch
-
Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
of United States v. LeeSearch
-
Allen v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Poindexter v. GreenhowSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial