Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Higgins Vs. Mccrea

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 01, 1886

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 9 linked 20 unlinked
Show
  1. Ford Vs. Williams US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1858
  2. Goddard Vs. Foster US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  3. Griggs Vs. Houston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  4. Brown Vs. Tarkington US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1865
  5. Davidson Vs. Lanier US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  6. Hanauer Vs. Doane US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1870
  7. Levy Vs. Gadsby US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1805
  8. Pleasants Vs. Fant US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  9. Armstrong Vs. Toler US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1826
  10. U.S. 671 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Higgins v. McCrea
    Search
  11. U.S. 671 (1886) Higgins v. McCrea
    Search
  12. exactly as if he were named in it, for it is treated as the contract of the principal as well as of the agent. Higgins v. Senior
    Search
  13. Huntington v. Knox
    Search
  14. Taintor v. Prendergast
    Search
  15. question of law. It depended on the construction of the rule, which it was the duty of the court to interpret. Levy v. Gadsby
    Search
  16. Walker v. Bank
    Search
  17. were not entitled to a verdict against the defendant upon the cause of action set out in their petition. Pleasants v. Fant
    Search
  18. Randall v. Baltimore
    Search
  19. set up in an answer, the plaintiff will not be allowed to dismiss his suit without the defendant's consent, Wiswell v. First
    Search
  20. Ohio St. 31, and it must state facts recognized by courts of law or equity as constituting a cause of action, Hill v. Butler
    Search
  21. in his pleading and supported by his own deposition, was not one on which any recovery could be had. Armstrong v. Toler
    Search
  22. were forbidden by law, and of its own motion should have directed a verdict against the defendant thereon. Oscanyan v. Arms
    Search
  23. could not recover the money advanced to the plaintiffs for what he intended to be an unlawful purpose. In Holman v. Johnson
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Higgins v. McCrea
    Search
  25. Higgins v. Senior
    Search
  26. Wiswell v. First
    Search
  27. Hill v. Butler
    Search
  28. Oscanyan v. Arms
    Search
  29. In Holman v. Johnson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial