Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Burnes Vs. Scott

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 05, 1886

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 3 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Watkins Vs. Holman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1842
  2. Bagnell Vs. Broderick US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1839
  3. Foster Vs. Mora US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  4. U.S. 582 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Burnes v. Scott
    Search
  5. U.S. 582 (1886) Burnes v. Scott
    Search
  6. says Mr. Chief Justice Taney in delivering judgment in the case of Bonnett v. Butterworth
    Search
  7. So, in Thompson v. Railroad
    Search
  8. Companies, 6 Wall. 134, the Court referred to Bennett v. Butterworth
    Search
  9. So, in the case of Jones v. McMasters
    Search
  10. of law in an action to recover possession, but for a court of equity to reform any error or mistake. So, in Foster v. Mora
    Search
  11. To the same effect, See Greer v. Mezes
    Search
  12. Bank of Hamilton v. Dudley
    Search
  13. Waterlow v. Bacon
    Search
  14. Hibbard v. Eastman
    Search
  15. Hopkins v. Fletcher
    Search
  16. Tommey v. Ellis
    Search
  17. the supreme court so holding on the ground that the common law had been adopted by statute in that state. See Duke v. Harper
    Search
  18. answer this question in the negative. It was wisely said by the Supreme Court of New York, in the case of Thallhimer v. Brinckerhoff
    Search
  19. is an accord with the views of this Court. The precise question under consideration was decided in the case of Boone v. Chiles
    Search
  20. whether the contract with Engles was valid or void. The same rule has been declared in other American cases. Whitney v. Kirtland
    Search
  21. Robison v. Beall
    Search
  22. Allison v. Chicago
    Search
  23. Northwestern Railroad, 42 Ia. 274. So, in Hilton v. Woods
    Search
  24. There was therefore a decree for the plaintiff, though without costs. In Elborough v. Ayres
    Search
  25. for the interference of a court of equity to prevent the action from going on, citing Vice-chancellor Wigram in Evans v. Prothero
    Search
  26. Barker v. Barker
    Search
  27. Wis. 131, and Allard v. Lamirande
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Burnes v. Scott
    Search
  29. of Bonnett v. Butterworth
    Search
  30. Thompson v. Railroad
    Search
  31. of Jones v. McMasters
    Search
  32. See Greer v. Mezes
    Search
  33. See Duke v. Harper
    Search
  34. of Thallhimer v. Brinckerhoff
    Search
  35. of Boone v. Chiles
    Search
  36. Whitney v. Kirtland
    Search
  37. Hilton v. Woods
    Search
  38. In Elborough v. Ayres
    Search
  39. Evans v. Prothero
    Search
  40. and Allard v. Lamirande
    Search
  41. Bennett v. Butterworth
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial