Citation network
Phillips Vs. Negley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 12, 1886
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 665 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Phillips v. NegleySearch
-
U.S. 665 (1886) Phillips v. NegleySearch
-
Interpreting the judgment of the general term by the opinion of the learned judge who spoke for the court, Phillips v. NegleySearch
-
negatived for this Court in regard to the powers of the courts of the United States by the decision in Bronson v. SchultenSearch
-
and the like, or error in the process through the fault of the clerk, for which writ, as was said in Pickett's Heirs v. LegerwoodSearch
-
it was said in Sibbald v. UnitedSearch
-
for errors of fact or law after the term in which they have been rendered, unless for clerical mistakes, Cameron v. McRobertsSearch
-
Bank of Kentucky v. WistarSearch
-
formulated by Chief Justice Marshall in a case arising in this district, of Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria v. HodgsonSearch
-
Cranch 332, and more tersely stated by Mr. Justice Curtis in Hendrickson v. HickleySearch
-
This rule is supported by Creath v. SimsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
How. 192, and Walker v. RobbinsSearch
-
How. 584, and was followed in Crim v. HandleySearch
-
U. S. 652 . In Brown v. CountySearch
-
of Buena Vista, 95 U. S. 157 , and Embry v. PalmerSearch
-
was rendered. The remedy by writ of error coram nobis continued in force and in use in Maryland. Hawkins v. BowieSearch
-
Bridendolph v. Zeller'sSearch
-
applies whether the result is reached by this writ or by the more summary mode of a motion. It was so decided in Graff v. Merchants'Search
-
Miners' Transportation Co., 18 Md. 364, and Craig v. WrothSearch
-
all of which, however, have been made since the cession of the present territory within the District of Columbia. Kemp v. CookSearch
-
Montgomery v. MurphySearch
-
Md. 576. In Kemp v. CookSearch
-
It appears also from the case of Kearney v. SascerSearch
-
the court in granting it, as Page 117 U. S. 678 declared by Chief Justice Marshall in Marine Ins. Co. v. HodgsonSearch
-
to all the respect due to the opinions of the highest court of the state, a rule acted upon in this Court in Ould v. WashingtonSearch
-
Hospital, 95 U. S. 303 , and approved in Russell v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Phillips v. NegleySearch
-
Bronson v. SchultenSearch
-
Sibbald v. UnitedSearch
-
of Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria v. HodgsonSearch
-
Hendrickson v. HickleySearch
-
Creath v. SimsSearch
-
and Walker v. RobbinsSearch
-
In Brown v. CountySearch
-
and Embry v. PalmerSearch
-
Maryland. Hawkins v. BowieSearch
-
Graff v. Merchants'Search
-
and Craig v. WrothSearch
-
the District of Columbia. Kemp v. CookSearch
-
In Kemp v. CookSearch
-
of Kearney v. SascerSearch
-
Marine Ins. Co. v. HodgsonSearch
-
Ould v. WashingtonSearch
-
Russell v. AllenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial