Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Buzard Vs. Houston

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 13, 1886

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Hipp Vs. Babin US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1856
  2. Lewis Vs. Cocks US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  3. Ambler Vs. Choteau US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1883
  4. Litchfield Vs. Ballou US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1885
  5. Watson Vs. Sutherland US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  6. U.S. 347 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Buzard v. Houston
    Search
  7. U.S. 347 (1886) Buzard v. Houston
    Search
  8. Insurance Co. v. Bailey
    Search
  9. Root v. Railway
    Search
  10. New York Guaranty Co. v. Memphis
    Search
  11. on the title to real estate, or preventing an injury for which damages are not recoverable at law, as in Watson v. Sutherland
    Search
  12. procured by fraud is of a continuing nature, and its rescission will prevent a multiplicity of suits, as in Boyce v. Grundy
    Search
  13. Pet. 210, 28 U. S. 215 , and in Jones v. Bolles
    Search
  14. when the like amount can be recovered at law in an action sounding in tort or for money had and received. Parkersburg v. Brown
    Search
  15. had and received. But the reason for this, as clearly brought out by Lords Justices Knight, Bruce, and Turner in Slim v. Croucher
    Search
  16. the earlier jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery. Upon any other ground, such bills could not be maintained. Clifford v. Brooke
    Search
  17. Thompson v. Barclay
    Search
  18. English court of equity has maintained a bill in such a case as that now before us. In Newham Page 119 U. S. 353 v. May
    Search
  19. their allegations, are entitled. There is therefore no ground upon which the bill can be maintained. Insurance Co. v. Bailey
    Search
  20. Russell v. Clark
    Search
  21. Cranch 69, 11 U. S. 89 . See also Horsburg v. Baker
    Search
  22. might be considered a bar to an action at law, and it is therefore, in accordance with the precedents in Rogers v. Durant
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Buzard v. Houston
    Search
  24. Boyce v. Grundy
    Search
  25. Jones v. Bolles
    Search
  26. Parkersburg v. Brown
    Search
  27. Slim v. Croucher
    Search
  28. Clifford v. Brooke
    Search
  29. Horsburg v. Baker
    Search
  30. Grand Chute v. Winegar
    Search
  31. Killian v. Ebbinghaus
    Search
  32. Brown v. Swann
    Search
  33. Rogers v. Durant
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial