Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Avegno Vs. Schmidt

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 25, 1885

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Pike Vs. Wassell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  2. French Vs. Wade US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  3. Day Vs. Micou US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  4. Shields Vs. Schiff US Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1888
  5. Bigelow Vs. Forrest US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1869
  6. U.S. 293 (1885) U.S. Supreme Court Avegno v. Schmidt
    Search
  7. U.S. 293 (1885) Avegno v. Schmidt
    Search
  8. in proceedings for confiscation, and as against the heirs at law of the person whose property is confiscated. Shields v. Schiff
    Search
  9. as a mortgagee was not divested or affected by the judgment of condemnation rendered by the district court. Day v. Micou
    Search
  10. the ownership, after his death, was in nowise affected except by placing it beyond his control while living. Wallach v. Van
    Search
  11. person whose property was condemned, to enable them to take the inheritance after his death. And in the case of Pike v. Wassell
    Search
  12. alienate or encumber the mortgaged premises to the prejudice of the mortgage, is well settled in Louisiana. In Nathan v. Lee
    Search
  13. In Stanbrough v. McCall
    Search
  14. or remotely, will be bound, although not made parties. In the present case, and in the later case of Shields v. Shiff
    Search
  15. alone had been made a party defendant. We think this decision is right. It is sustained by the case of Wallach v. Van
    Search
  16. is that where the ancestor might have taken and been seized, the heir shall inherit. Fortescue, J., in Thornby v. Fleetwood
    Search
  17. to pass upon the validity of the mortgage in the suit for the condemnation of the mortgaged property. Bigelow v. Forrest
    Search
  18. Donaldson v. Maurin
    Search
  19. Moss v. Collier
    Search
  20. Lawrence v. Burthe
    Search
  21. Nicolet v. Moreau
    Search
  22. Guesnard v. Soulie
    Search
  23. Smith v. Nettles
    Search
  24. Murphy v. Jandot
    Search
  25. Gas-Light & Banking Co. v. Allen
    Search
  26. Dodd v. Crain
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Avegno v. Schmidt
    Search
  28. Wallach v. Van
    Search
  29. of Pike v. Wassell
    Search
  30. Louisiana. In Nathan v. Lee
    Search
  31. of Shields v. Shiff
    Search
  32. of Wallach v. Van
    Search
  33. Thornby v. Fleetwood
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial