Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Watts Vs. Camors

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 16, 1885

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 7 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Norrington Vs. Wright US Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1885
  2. Van Buren Vs. Digges US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  3. Pritchard Vs. Norton US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1882
  4. Russell Vs. Southard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1851
  5. Tayloe Vs. Sandiford US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1822
  6. Wayman Vs. Southard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  7. Warren Vs. Stoddart US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  8. U.S. 353 (1885) U.S. Supreme Court Watts v. Camors
    Search
  9. U.S. 353 (1885) Watts v. Camors
    Search
  10. by the designation of the ship by name, and by the unequivocal stipulations regarding the cargo to be carried. Brawley v. United
    Search
  11. Barker v. Windle
    Search
  12. Ashburner v. Balchen
    Search
  13. Morris v. Levison
    Search
  14. Page 115 U. S. 361 equity would stay proceedings at law upon payment of the damages actually suffered. Clark v. Barnard
    Search
  15. Sloman v. Walter
    Search
  16. of law would regard such a clause in such a contract as a penalty only, and not as liquidating the damages. Tayloe v. Sandiford
    Search
  17. Higginson v. Weld
    Search
  18. Harrison v. Wright
    Search
  19. Brown v. Lull
    Search
  20. Hall v. Hurlbut
    Search
  21. Richmond v. New
    Search
  22. M'Nair v. Thompson
    Search
  23. English v. Latham
    Search
  24. Welch v. Thorn
    Search
  25. Barrow v. Bloom
    Search
  26. contract is to be regulated by the law which they must be presumed to have had in view when they executed it. Wayman v. Southard
    Search
  27. and cannot be limited in its extent or controlled in its exercise by the laws of the several states. United States v. Howland
    Search
  28. idle until the lay days had expired, Page 115 U. S. 363 and therefore, within the rule laid down in Warren v. Stoddart
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Watts v. Camors
    Search
  30. Brawley v. United
    Search
  31. Clark v. Barnard
    Search
  32. United States v. Howland
    Search
  33. Livingston v. Story
    Search
  34. Neves v. Scott
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial