Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Call Vs. Palmer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 14, 1885

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 1 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Houghton Vs. Payne US Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1904
  2. U.S. 98 (1885) U.S. Supreme Court Call v. Palmer
    Search
  3. U.S. 98 (1885) Call v. Palmer
    Search
  4. which is the basis of this suit was made in Iowa, and the contract must be governed by the laws of Iowa. De Wolf v. Johnson
    Search
  5. Scudder v. Union
    Search
  6. Mrs. Davidson is chargeable with making a usurious contract. It was said by this Court in Bank of the United States v. Waggener
    Search
  7. To the same effect are the cases of Lloyd v. Scott
    Search
  8. Condit v. Baldwin
    Search
  9. N.Y. 219, and Jones v. Berryhill
    Search
  10. the lawful rate, without authority or knowledge of his principal, the loan is not thereby rendered usurious. Dagnall v. Wigley
    Search
  11. Solarte v. Melville
    Search
  12. Barretto v. Snowden
    Search
  13. Bell v. Day
    Search
  14. Conover v. Van
    Search
  15. Rogers v. Buckingham
    Search
  16. Gokey v. Knapp
    Search
  17. Wyllis v. Ault
    Search
  18. Brigham v. Myers
    Search
  19. Ia. 397. In Gokey v. Knapp
    Search
  20. So in Brigham v. Myers
    Search
  21. new contract is not a contrivance to evade the statutes against usury, the latter is not illegal or usurious. Cuthbert v. Haley
    Search
  22. Bearce v. Barston
    Search
  23. Powell v. Waters
    Search
  24. Kent v. Walton
    Search
  25. Conn. 396. This rule is recognized by the Supreme Court of Iowa. Thus, in Wendlebone v. Parks
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Call v. Palmer
    Search
  27. of Iowa. De Wolf v. Johnson
    Search
  28. Bank of the United States v. Waggener
    Search
  29. of Lloyd v. Scott
    Search
  30. and Jones v. Berryhill
    Search
  31. Dagnall v. Wigley
    Search
  32. In Gokey v. Knapp
    Search
  33. Cuthbert v. Haley
    Search
  34. Wendlebone v. Parks
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales