Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Krippendorf Vs. Hyde

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 28, 1884

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 7 linked 20 unlinked
Show
  1. Pennock Vs. Coe US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  2. Hagan Vs. Lucas US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1836
  3. Freeman Vs. Howe US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1860
  4. Watson Vs. Sutherland US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  5. Buck Vs. Colbath US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1865
  6. Clarke Vs. Mathewson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1838
  7. Van Norden Vs. Morton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  8. U.S. 276 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Krippendorf v. Hyde
    Search
  9. U.S. 276 (1884) Krippendorf v. Hyde
    Search
  10. out of which it arose, can be maintained without reference to the citizenship or residence of the parties. Freeman v. Howe
    Search
  11. goods, Page 110 U. S. 280 which remained, in contemplation of law, in the possession of the officer, Gass v. Williams
    Search
  12. return of the property to him by the officer, might have maintained an action of replevin on proof of title. Louthain v. Fitzer
    Search
  13. in Indiana he would not be permitted to become a party to the suit in order to have his title there determined. Risher v. Gilpin
    Search
  14. that would not in all cases furnish an adequate remedy by giving damages for the value of the property taken. Watson v. Sutherland
    Search
  15. being in the hands of the marshal, is regarded as in the custody of the court. This was the point decided in Freeman v. Howe
    Search
  16. Gue v. Tide
    Search
  17. own process so as to prevent and redress wrong. This principle was illustrated and applied in the case of Bank v. Turnbull
    Search
  18. as well where the property consists of goods and chattels or personalty, as where it is real estate. Thus, in Martin v. Willis
    Search
  19. to protect their own jurisdiction and officers in the possession of property that is in the custody of the law, Buck v. Colbath
    Search
  20. the intervention of the stranger to the action in his own interest, as what Mr. Justice Story calls, in Clarke v. Mathewson
    Search
  21. The question was discussed in Van Norden v. Morton
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Krippendorf v. Hyde
    Search
  23. Gass v. Williams
    Search
  24. Louthain v. Fitzer
    Search
  25. Risher v. Gilpin
    Search
  26. of Bank v. Turnbull
    Search
  27. Martin v. Willis
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial