Citation network
Ames Vs. Kansas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 21, 1884
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 449 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Ames v. KansasSearch
-
U.S. 449 (1884) Ames v. KansasSearch
-
courts from state courts without regard to the character of the parties. The reasoning and language in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
common law writ of quo warranto was a civil writ at the suit of the Crown, and not a criminal prosecution. Rex v. MarsdenSearch
-
The King v. FrancisSearch
-
any special legislation to that effect, has always been its character in many of the states of the Union. Commonwealth v. BrowneSearch
-
State v. HardieSearch
-
State Bank v. StateSearch
-
State v. LingoSearch
-
New Jersey, Arkansas, and Illinois, but in all these states it is used as a civil remedy only. Attorney General v. UticaSearch
-
People v. JonesSearch
-
State v. WestSearch
-
State v. AshleySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. RoeSearch
-
action to determine a civil right. This has been the construction put upon similar laws in other states. State v. McDanielSearch
-
Central & Georgetown Railroad Company v. TaylorSearch
-
Commercial Bank of Rodney v. StateSearch
-
the cases arise under these acts of Congress, for, to use the language of Chief Justice Marshall in Osborn v. UnitedSearch
-
is so, it has never been doubted that a case is presented which arises under the laws of the United States. Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
Gold Washing & Water Co. v. KeyesSearch
-
Railroad Company v. MississippiSearch
-
judge agreed in opinion with Mr. Justice Wilson, and consequently the jurisdiction was sustained. United States v. RavaraSearch
-
On the 18th of February, 1793, just before the indictment against Ravara in the circuit court, the case of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
in any court of the United States. Resolve of the Legislature of Mass. Sept. 27, 1793. In Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
but this was not necessary to the determination of the cause, and the Chief Justice himself, afterwards, in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
afterwards, in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
the general expressions in the case Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
In Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
case is to be construed in connection with the general subject then under consideration. The same is true of Osborn v. UnitedSearch
-
courts of the United States had jurisdiction of suits by and against the United States Bank. In United States v. OrtegaSearch
-
exclusive, but it was not decided, because the suit was found not to be one affecting a public minister. In Davis v. PackardSearch
-
cases affecting consuls was, in 1838, directly presented to Chief Justice Taney on the circuit in the case of Gittings v. CrawfordSearch
-
Afterwards, Mr. Justice Nelson, in the case of St. Luke's Hospital v. BarclaySearch
-
Blatch. 259, 265, in 1855, and in Graham v. StuckenSearch
-
been vested exclusively in the Supreme Court. Following these decisions we have held at the present term, in Boers v. PrestonSearch
-
has been seen, it was not given by the Judiciary Act of 1789, and it did not exist in 1873, when the case of Wisconsin v. DuluthSearch
-
is whether the Constitution exempts the states from its operation. The same exemption was claimed in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
had not already been invested by law with exclusive cognizance. To quote again from Chief Justice Marshall, in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ames v. KansasSearch
-
Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
Rex v. MarsdenSearch
-
of the Union. Commonwealth v. BrowneSearch
-
Attorney General v. UticaSearch
-
State v. McDanielSearch
-
Osborn v. UnitedSearch
-
of the United States. Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
United States v. RavaraSearch
-
of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial