Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Blair Vs. Cuming County

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 21, 1884

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Blair v. Cuming
    Search
  2. County - 111 U.S. 363 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Blair v. Cuming
    Search
  3. County, 111 U.S. 363 (1884) Blair v. Cuming
    Search
  4. are not those of the defendant, and it cannot be sued on them. This question was decided by this Court in Davenport v. County
    Search
  5. owner of these coupons, or even since, holding in accordance with the contention of the defendant. In Osborne v. County
    Search
  6. the same term, a petition for rehearing was filed, and the attention of the court was called to the case of Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  7. to its view that the act did not cover the construction of a steam grist mill, and denied the rehearing. Osborne v. Adams
    Search
  8. County, 109 U. S. 1 . In Union Pacific Railroad v. Commissioners
    Search
  9. by the public. But the court said that no authority existed to aid a merely private enterprise. See also United States v. Dodge
    Search
  10. County, 110 U. S. 156 . In State v. Thorne
    Search
  11. and numerous other enterprises, not objects of private concern purely. Page 111 U. S. 371 In Dawson County v. McNamar
    Search
  12. In Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  13. the effect of which would be to destroy the water power of the former, and it stated that, under the cases of Nosser v. Seeley
    Search
  14. Neb. 460, and Seeley v. Bridges
    Search
  15. commissioners of the county shall establish and regulate the amount of toll to be charged. The court held, in Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  16. the act. We concur in these views and regard them as a sound exposition of the legislation of Nebraska. In Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  17. to furnish such power, the improvement of it is a public work of internal improvement. In Township of Burlington v. Beasley
    Search
  18. property may be appropriated to carry them into effect. Boston & Roxbury Page 111 U. S. 373 Mill Corp. v. Newman
    Search
  19. Commonwealth v. Essex
    Search
  20. Lowell v. Boston
    Search
  21. Scudder v. Trenton
    Search
  22. Beekman v. Saratoga
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Blair v. Cuming
    Search
  24. Davenport v. County
    Search
  25. In Osborne v. County
    Search
  26. of Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  27. Osborne v. Adams
    Search
  28. In Union Pacific Railroad v. Commissioners
    Search
  29. United States v. Dodge
    Search
  30. In State v. Thorne
    Search
  31. In Dawson County v. McNamar
    Search
  32. of Nosser v. Seeley
    Search
  33. and Seeley v. Bridges
    Search
  34. Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  35. of Nebraska. In Traver v. Merrick
    Search
  36. In Township of Burlington v. Beasley
    Search
  37. Mill Corp. v. Newman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial