Citation network
Hagar Vs. Reclamation District
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 05, 1884
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hagar v. ReclamationSearch
-
District - 111 U.S. 701 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Hagar v. ReclamationSearch
-
District, 111 U.S. 701 (1884) Hagar v. ReclamationSearch
-
the appropriation of the proceeds of the granted swamp lands rests solely in the good faith of the state. Mills County v. RailroadSearch
-
by general taxation or by laying the burden upon the district specially benefited by the expenditure. County of Mobile v. KimballSearch
-
an application of the rule would often produce the very inequality it was designed to prevent. As we said in Louisiana v. PillsburySearch
-
to obligations for the payment of money founded on contracts, express or implied. This point was decided in Lane Co. v. OregonSearch
-
to define with precision so as to cover all cases. It is no doubt wiser, as stated by MR. JUSTICE MILLER in Davidson v. NewSearch
-
of those general rules established in our system of jurisprudence for the security of private rights. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
for the enforcement of taxes or assessments. As stated by MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY in his concurring opinion in Davidson v. NewSearch
-
which can be deemed essential Page 111 U. S. 711 to render the proceedings due process of law. In Davidson v. NewSearch
-
respecting the assessment. In them he may set forth by way of defense all his grievances. Reclamation District No. 108 v. EvansSearch
-
lands was thereby created. This was distinctly held, after elaborate consideration, in the recent case of Mills County v. RailroadSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the duties of assessors in estimating the value of property for purposes of general taxation are judicial, see Barhyte v. ShepherdSearch
-
Hassan v. RochesterSearch
-
Stuart v. PalmerSearch
-
Jordan v. HyattSearch
-
Ireland v. RochesterSearch
-
State v. JerseySearch
-
State v. MorristownSearch
-
Griffin v. MixonSearch
-
Overing v. FooteSearch
-
Thomas v. GainSearch
-
Wheeler v. MillsSearch
-
State v. NewarkSearch
-
State v. TrentonSearch
-
State v. ElizabethSearch
-
State v. PlainfieldSearch
-
Patten v. GreenSearch
-
Mulligan v. SmithSearch
-
County of San Mateo v. SouthernSearch
-
County of Santa Clara v. SameSearch
-
Darling v. GunnSearch
-
Ill. 424. See also Gatch v. CitySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hagar v. ReclamationSearch
-
Mills County v. RailroadSearch
-
Louisiana v. PillsburySearch
-
Lane Co. v. OregonSearch
-
Davidson v. NewSearch
-
Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In Davidson v. NewSearch
-
of Mills County v. RailroadSearch
-
Barhyte v. ShepherdSearch
-
Gatch v. CitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial