Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Carroll County Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 05, 1884

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 5 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Dixon County Vs. Field US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1884
  2. School District Vs. Stone US Supreme Court · Nov 06, 1882
  3. County of Warren Vs. Marcy US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  4. Burgess Vs. Seligman US Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1883
  5. County of Cass Vs. Johnston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  6. U.S. 556 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Carroll County v. Smith
    Search
  7. U.S. 556 (1884) Carroll County v. Smith
    Search
  8. as qualified to vote, but only two-thirds of those actually voting at the election held for the purpose. Hawkins v. Carroll
    Search
  9. Co., 50 Miss. 735, disregarded, and St. Joseph's Townskip v. Rogers
    Search
  10. Wall. 644, and County of Cass v. Johnston
    Search
  11. Court, constitute an estoppel which prevents inquiry into the alleged invalidity of the bonds. Northern Bank of Toledo v. Porter
    Search
  12. Court is bound to follow and apply the judgment of the Supreme Court of Mississippi in that case, reported as Hawkins v. Carroll
    Search
  13. no constructive notice of any fraud or illegality by virtue of the doctrine of lis pendens. County of Warren v. Marcy
    Search
  14. to take notice at all events and which is now for adjudication in this case. There is nothing in the case of Williams v. Cammack
    Search
  15. to which we are referred by counsel on this point inconsistent with these views. The decision in Hawkins v. Carroll
    Search
  16. granted to citizens of one state, suing in another, the choice of resorting to a federal tribunal. Burgess v. Seligman
    Search
  17. We have, however, considered the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, in its opinion in the case of Hawkins v. Carroll
    Search
  18. not able to adopt its conclusions. On the contrary, we are constrained to follow the decision in St. Joseph Township v. Rogers
    Search
  19. Wall. 664, and adhere to the views expressed by this Court in County of Cass v. Johnston
    Search
  20. was Page 111 U. S. 564 a constitutional provision requiring a registration of all qualified voters. State v. Sutterfield
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Carroll County v. Smith
    Search
  22. Hawkins v. Carroll
    Search
  23. and St. Joseph's Townskip v. Rogers
    Search
  24. and County of Cass v. Johnston
    Search
  25. Northern Bank of Toledo v. Porter
    Search
  26. of Williams v. Cammack
    Search
  27. of Hawkins v. Carroll
    Search
  28. St. Joseph Township v. Rogers
    Search
  29. State v. Sutterfield
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial