Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Barrett Vs. Failing

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 05, 1884

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 1 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Cheely Vs. Clayton US Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1884
  2. U.S. 523 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Barrett v. Failing
    Search
  3. U.S. 523 (1884) Barrett v. Failing
    Search
  4. s right of dower, and the husband's tenancy by the curtesy unless expressly or impliedly preserved by statute. Barber v. Root
    Search
  5. Hood v. Hood
    Search
  6. Rice v. Lumley
    Search
  7. Lamkin v. Knapp
    Search
  8. Gould v. Crow
    Search
  9. to, the divorce was obtained in another state. The ground of the decision of the Court of Appeals of New York in Wait v. Wait
    Search
  10. that she should retain her right of dower in case of a divorce for the misconduct of the husband. See also Reynolds v. Reynolds
    Search
  11. Wend. 193. The decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Colvin v. Reed
    Search
  12. Penn.St. 375, and in Reel v. Elder
    Search
  13. the court which granted the divorce Page 111 U. S. 526 had no jurisdiction over the wife. And see Cheely v. Clayton
    Search
  14. by the courts of the state by the legislature of which it is passed and in which the land is situated. In Mansfield v. McIntyre
    Search
  15. be reconciled with the later cases in Ohio and elsewhere, as shown by the authorities before referred to. In Harding v. Alden
    Search
  16. demandant was entitled to judgment if she had been legally divorced. The statute of Missouri, which was said in Gould v. Crow
    Search
  17. brought in the county where the land lies, is in the nature of a bill of review for newly discovered evidence. Bamford v. Bamford
    Search
  18. Wetmore v. Wetmore
    Search
  19. Hall v. Hall
    Search
  20. Weiss v. Bethel
    Search
  21. U. S. 529 The other cases cited in behalf of the appellant are quite unlike the case at bar. In Barrett v. Barrett
    Search
  22. conveyance of property made by him with the fraudulent intent of preventing her from recovering the alimony. Barber v. Barber
    Search
  23. Livermore v. Boutelle
    Search
  24. Bouslough v. Bouslough
    Search
  25. Godey, 39 Cal. 157, and in Whetstone v. Coffey
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Barrett v. Failing
    Search
  27. Barber v. Root
    Search
  28. Wait v. Wait
    Search
  29. Reynolds v. Reynolds
    Search
  30. Colvin v. Reed
    Search
  31. Reel v. Elder
    Search
  32. In Mansfield v. McIntyre
    Search
  33. In Harding v. Alden
    Search
  34. Bamford v. Bamford
    Search
  35. In Barrett v. Barrett
    Search
  36. Whetstone v. Coffey
    Search
  37. Barber v. Barber
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial